Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Load Distribution Question

Load Distribution Question

Load Distribution Question

I am designing a bridge on private property that the owner would like to be wood. However, due to the span and clearance limitations, I will be using timber planks over steel stringers. I was comparing load distribution between AASHTO and table The 36" spacing or 6x nominal plank thickness limitation bothers me. In the commentary, the code states that the approximate methods of analysis are not valid and two dimensional methods of analysis are recommended.
Now, I'm having difficulties with the "Orthogonal plate theory" method, especially considering a wood plank deck. Can someone shed some light on this?

RE: Load Distribution Question

Is this a one lane bridge? If so, LL distribution goes away. Also are you using planks clipped to the stringers or a stress laminated deck? If the former, I doubt you can use orthotropic plate theory..

RE: Load Distribution Question

Is this a one lane bridge? If so, LL distribution goes away. Also are you using planks clipped to the stringers or a stress laminated deck? If the former, I doubt you can use orthotropic plate theory.

RE: Load Distribution Question

Yes, a one lane bridge. I was thinking of using 8x planks. I haven't decided if I would fasten a nailer to the steel stringer or just provide welded steel studs to anchor the planks. So, if a one lane bridge, LL distribution goes away?

RE: Load Distribution Question

Technically speaking, even a one lane bridge requires a distribution factor. However, and some will disagree with my approach, the purpose of the distribution factor is to reduce the total live load in the stringer being designed. If you disregard the DF you'll simply end up with a more conservative design.

One thing I should have pointed out earlier: Table 4-etc deals with the DF for the stringer design. Chapter 9 deals with the actual deck design.

What live load are you using? HL-93? If this is access to a private home you could justify using something less, for example the larges anticipated fire truck.

RE: Load Distribution Question

Yes, this bridge is on private property, but I want to design for HL-93. They have dump trucks, farm equipment, etc and the County wants it rated 20 ton for their fire trucks. I have the deck designed, I was moving on to the stringers. I remember back in my ASD designs, I used S/4 distribution for stringer design. If I disregard the DF, then I end up with the entire wheel load supported by one stringer. In my case, using the current specifications, S/6.7 gives DF at .45. I suppose that I could assume LL resisted by 2 stringers (or DF of .5) and be conservative. Your thoughts?

RE: Load Distribution Question

You could use the lever rule also. How long is your span? If it is shear might control. Similarly, minimum depth might control unless the owner isn't overly concerned about deflection.

RE: Load Distribution Question

The stringer span is 70'. Yes, using the lever rule, based on my geometry, essentially one stringer supports the wheel load.
This will be slightly conservative and there is nothing wrong with that.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - 10 Reasons to Choose CATIA on the Cloud
To compete in today’s fast-paced and competitive market, smaller and newer firms need a powerful platform that will enable them to compete with bigger players, without the heavy investments needed in computer hardware, software and personnel. Download Now
White Paper - Smart Manufacturing for Electronics
This white paper describes a transformative approach to electronics manufacturing made possible by the addition of Mentor Graphics to the Siemens family. It describes a completely digitalized strategy that supports both printed circuit board (PCB) and mechanical design and manufacturing, uniting the entire product lifecycle – from idea and production to customers and back. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close