BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic
BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic
(OP)
Can anyone tell me what the main advantages would be of having a 7%Cr martensitic material instead of BW10?
I am aware they both have reasonable wear resistance, and suspect 7%Cr is more expensive.
Is 7%Cr a more 'castable' material?
Is there a big difference when it comes to having them in high temperature service?
I am aware they both have reasonable wear resistance, and suspect 7%Cr is more expensive.
Is 7%Cr a more 'castable' material?
Is there a big difference when it comes to having them in high temperature service?
RE: BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic
The natural passive film will be much stronger.
These alloys have shown good resistance to flow accelerated corrosion, corrosion/wear mechanisms, and they have better resistance to scaling at elevated temperatures.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube
RE: BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic
Muchly appreciated.
RE: BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic
They use a lot of 3% and 5% Cr grades in ore handling where they need material to slide against it.
So some wear resistance and corrosion resistance to the acidic run off from the ore.
7% Cr should give you decent scaling resistance to about 1200F.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube
RE: BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic
RE: BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic
If corrosion and/or oxidation are factors then the 7% Cr will give increased performance.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube
RE: BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic