×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic

BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic

BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic

(OP)
Can anyone tell me what the main advantages would be of having a 7%Cr martensitic material instead of BW10?
I am aware they both have reasonable wear resistance, and suspect 7%Cr is more expensive.
Is 7%Cr a more 'castable' material?
Is there a big difference when it comes to having them in high temperature service?
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic

The 7Cr alloy will have some corrosion resistance.
The natural passive film will be much stronger.
These alloys have shown good resistance to flow accelerated corrosion, corrosion/wear mechanisms, and they have better resistance to scaling at elevated temperatures.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic

(OP)
Thanks kindly Ed.
Muchly appreciated.

RE: BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic

It isn't really stainless, but it will not become as rough as carbon steel would.
They use a lot of 3% and 5% Cr grades in ore handling where they need material to slide against it.
So some wear resistance and corrosion resistance to the acidic run off from the ore.

7% Cr should give you decent scaling resistance to about 1200F.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic

The BW10 is a high carbon (1% by mass), manganese steel casting that would easily handle abrasive wear conditions because this material can be work hardened, and can handle impact load conditions. You really need to know the actual environment and service temperature to make a good comparison.

RE: BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic

If wear is the biggest issue then stay with the BW10.
If corrosion and/or oxidation are factors then the 7% Cr will give increased performance.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: BW10 vs 7% Cr Martensitic

Expect BW10 to have superior "castability" properties.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close