rowingengineer
Structural
As everyone would be aware, the roller door code AS4505 has been update and referenced in the BCA for regions C & D.
This has ensured that every roller door supplier is now supplying with wind locks.
my questions is do you believe we need to design for full internal pressure or just external pressure to the building.
AS1170.2 still allows you to assume a dominant opening at this roller doors, base on the in-ability of the door, jamb or connections. AS4505 has no requirement for the supporting structure.
as such I would prefer if a dominant opening developed elsewhere in the building then my roller door failed rather than trying to design my roller door to take this loading
type of roller door I am discussing:
if you look at the load assumptions by the roller door manufacture, they assume +0.6, -0.3 internal coefficients.
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."
This has ensured that every roller door supplier is now supplying with wind locks.
my questions is do you believe we need to design for full internal pressure or just external pressure to the building.
AS1170.2 still allows you to assume a dominant opening at this roller doors, base on the in-ability of the door, jamb or connections. AS4505 has no requirement for the supporting structure.
as such I would prefer if a dominant opening developed elsewhere in the building then my roller door failed rather than trying to design my roller door to take this loading
type of roller door I am discussing:
if you look at the load assumptions by the roller door manufacture, they assume +0.6, -0.3 internal coefficients.
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."