×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Semi-Rigid Diaphragm for Metal Roof Deck
2

Semi-Rigid Diaphragm for Metal Roof Deck

Semi-Rigid Diaphragm for Metal Roof Deck

(OP)
Has anyone modeled a semi-rigid metal deck diaphragm in RISA-3D? I would like to find some guidance on adjusting my steel plate thickness and shear modulus (G) to account for proper deck stiffness with fasteners. I asked RISA support and they did not have any specific quidance on this topic other than tell me to adust these values. TIA.
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Semi-Rigid Diaphragm for Metal Roof Deck

I believe the Steel Deck Institute has a design manual of some sort which gives a method of calculating a revised G value based on assumed fastener slip.

We might have the reference somewhere around here (I know I've seen it before). But, I don't have it close at hand.

If memory serves me correct, the procedure is to use the gage thickness of the deck as the plate thickness. Then you just have to modify the G value based on fastener spacing.

RE: Semi-Rigid Diaphragm for Metal Roof Deck

(OP)
I found this in the Diaphragm Design Manual on pg 3-3 where the effective modulus G = G'/t; where G' is the adjusted stiffness and t is the deck thickness. I looked at the example RAM provided and they were calculating an adjusted E' - Effective Modulus. I'm not sure why you would change both G and E for your material properties in RISA.

For my RISA model I plan to revise the effective Modulus G based on my deck and attachment properties and leave E at 29,500 ksi. I will set my density to 0 kcf and keep the plate thickness as 20 GA (0.358") plus check the plane stress. Does this sound reasonable? Do I need to back into an equivalent deck thickness based on the moment of inertia for a ribbed deck?

RE: Semi-Rigid Diaphragm for Metal Roof Deck

That sounds reasonable. I am not a RISA user, and RAM doesnt let you mess with G for plates, so you modify E and have no shear deformation to simulate the deck. With the case with RAM, i keep the thickness as the actual thickness as well.

RE: Semi-Rigid Diaphragm for Metal Roof Deck

Sorry for the slow response. My computer is having conflicts with Eng-Tips lately. Not sure why.

StructSU10 has it basically correct. Some program (which force you to use isotropic plates) will ignore the G value entry for the plates. RISA used to be like that. But, at some point (version 9.0-ish) we started considering the G value for plate elements. So, in the current version of RISA you would only have to modify the G value.

RE: Semi-Rigid Diaphragm for Metal Roof Deck

(OP)
Thanks, Josh/structSU10! Great info.

RE: Semi-Rigid Diaphragm for Metal Roof Deck

(OP)
Josh,

To close the loop on this, do you know if RISA automatically adjusts G based on the plate thickness you enter or do I need to make this adjustment myself like I describe above per the Diaphragm Design Manual on pg 3-3 the effective modulus G = G'/t; where G' where G' is the adjusted stiffness and t is the deck thickness?

RE: Semi-Rigid Diaphragm for Metal Roof Deck

You will need to make the adjustments yourself.


At some point (if RISA does eventually do this in a future release) then we will have to ask for deck definition data where you specifically tell the program what type of deck is being defined. Maybe how often the connectors are spaced.... that sort of thing. RISAFloor is close to having enough information to do this, but not RISA-3D.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close