Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

EMI suppression at 2.4 GHz

EMI suppression at 2.4 GHz

EMI suppression at 2.4 GHz

I can find chokes (Fair-rite 61 material) that are good to 1000 MHz. What materials are good for attenuating frequencies above a GHz? I have a legacy amplifier in a system that we want to get a CE mark on. It is having immunity issues in the band from 100 MHz to 2400 MHz. I have seen good initial test results by adding chokes with 43 material (<250 MHz) on the amplifier pins, so I'm hoping to solve this by blocking the EMI path across the full band. The EMI source is predefined, and I'd rather not redesign the EMI receptor (amplifier).



RE: EMI suppression at 2.4 GHz

Magram, get a free sample kit from Arc-Tech, Cuming Corp, emersoncumingmp.
Attenuates higher frequencies, but not as convenient as a ferrite coil.
To get good attenuation, you need current on the wire to be surrounded by Magram, then metal.
Picture coax., your problem wire is the center conductor, Magram is the Teflon, and metal on the outside. Most Magram is very flexible, you can make a loop.

RE: EMI suppression at 2.4 GHz

Other thing might be a couple small ceramic capacitors of different values, 10pF, 100pF or 1000pf, with as absolutely little lead length as you can do on the power pins, in addition to the ferrite bead of 43 material (or other material). No doubt your active (amp) components already have a bypass of maybe 0.1uF, but if you calculate how much lead inductance it takes with a 0.1uF to go past resonance at a given frequency, you will find that it takes only the inductance of a few pico-Henry. A few pico-Henry is only equal to a few thousandths of an inch. The additional low pF caps bypassing added where they're not sharing the same leads (not sharing the same lead inductance) as the other bypass capacitors will help address this issue if your immunity problem is arising from the power leads.

RE: EMI suppression at 2.4 GHz

Thanks for the ideas. So far it looks like I'm seeing similar improvements with the chokes on the power leads or the output pins.

RE: EMI suppression at 2.4 GHz

Thanks. The Magram is interesting; I requested a sample kit so I can learn more.

So far I've found I can get about a 6-12 dB improvement at 2.4 GHz with 61-material chokes on my power and output leads of my amplifier.

I ran a few calculations and it looks like I'm only getting 12-14 dB of shielding off my enclosure so I may have better luck with improvements there. I'm starting to evaluate feedthrough caps at the entry into the main enclosure. Tusonix has some that are good to 10 GHz.


RE: EMI suppression at 2.4 GHz

Magram is used on top covers, underneath to absorber. But salt water in a small ziplock does pretty well too. Or a wet sponge.
If you don't want to wait for the magram, try the cheap approach with salt water.

RE: EMI suppression at 2.4 GHz

Thanks. I always like learning a new shortcut!

RE: EMI suppression at 2.4 GHz

Well, I'm back from the test facility. I have a 1.5" circular opening in the enclosure that surprisingly is not a leakage path; I didn't have to screen that opening. I found out my existing aluminum cover with approx. 2" spacing between the screws was only providing about 9 dB of attenuation at 747 MHz. Adding Marian RF Gasket improved that to 86 dB. Adding Tusonix feed thru caps on the signals passing through the cover results in overall shielding at least 100 dB, as the interference is now below my noise floor. I'm impressed, I didn't think I'd get this far with only shielding.

NASA has a really good article online about shielding effectiveness - NASA Contractor report 4784 - Design Guidelines for Shielding Effectiveness, Current Carrying Capability, and the Enhancement of Conductivity of Composite Materials. It is available here:



Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close