×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Mismatch transmission losses and effects on maximum power output of SSPA

Mismatch transmission losses and effects on maximum power output of SSPA

Mismatch transmission losses and effects on maximum power output of SSPA

(OP)
This is a weird way of looking at matching losses so I want to confirm I am looking at this properly. Normally you would look at it as reducing RF output power.
I have tuned my solid state power amplifier (SSPA) so I have a pretty good match (1.5:1 worse case). The antenna it is connected to has a 2:1 mismatch. Now this is were it gets interesting; we only made power output measurements with a 2:1 sliding load connected to the output and rotated the angle of the load to get a minimum output power measurement. Let's say that measurement is 30dBm. Someone wants to know what the theoretical maximum power of the SSPA could be based on this minimum measurement because we can't retake the measurement to find the angle at which the maximum power is produced. Keep in mind the output of the SSPA has an isolator so the active devices are fairly well isolated from the load and don't get pulled around during the rotation of the angle.
Here are my thoughts:
1) The 2:1 mismatch has a transmission loss of 0.51dB
2) The 1.5:1 mismatch of the SSPA has a transmission loss of 0.18dB

When we made the first measurement we intentionally rotated the angle of the load to find the worse case match or minimum Pout point. If you connect a 2:1 sliding load again is it correct to say that you could theoretically find a match that would produce a power output of 30dBm + 0.51dB + 0.18dB = 30.69dBm?

Can you explain either way?

Thank you ahead of time for any help you can provide.

RE: Mismatch transmission losses and effects on maximum power output of SSPA

Some points for your consideration.

Your mention of sliding loads and isolator, as well as perhaps your choice of forum ('Microwave...'), implies that this is a microwave transmitter. Therefore transmission line losses cannot be ignored - especially when you're accounting for the last 0.01 of each dB. The transmission line loss will be impacted by the VSWR (the standing waves increase the losses on a line as compared to a 'flat' line).

Also, transmission line lengths will have an influence. If the two mismatches are both in the same 'direction', and the transmission line happens to have an electrical length of a multiple of a half wavelength, then perhaps the two mismatches will be more efficiently matched than just one mismatch at one end. There are an infinite number of solutions on the Smith chart that can have wrongs (mismatch), and a transmission line of the 'correct length', make a right.

So the short answer is that the situation is far more complicated than simply adding the two VSWR mismatch losses in a linear fashion. There are other factors at play (a la Smith chart, etc.).

RE: Mismatch transmission losses and effects on maximum power output of SSPA

(OP)
I understand and I should probably add something to make my question a little more clear.
Since the 30dBm is measured with a sliding load and finding the angle when the Pout is at the minimum point if I was to hook up a double stub tuner instead of the sliding 2:1 load could I find a conjugate match that would produce an output that is 30dBm + 0.51dB + 0.18dB= 30.69dBm or would it just be 30.51dBm? I ask because the amplifier source impedance is 1.5:1 and the sliding load is a 2:1.

RE: Mismatch transmission losses and effects on maximum power output of SSPA

Your question almost needs something like a 45 minute discussion to explore, even at a high level. Given the limitations of this type of written forum, I'll try to hit some the high points.

As per EE101, your amplifier will (theoretically, and probably practically too) produce maximum power when it is presented with a load that matches its actual Zo. Do you know your amplifier's Zo (as opposed to the 1.5:1 VSWR)?

With RF, you must always keep the Smith chart concepts in mind. The match needs to be presented at the correct location considering the electrical length of the transmission line.

If Zo is not a standard impedance (e.g. 50 ohms), then what do you plan to use as the transmission line and test equipment?

How are you measuring power if the line is not flat? You might want to investigate exactly how your power meter works. Many detect peak voltage and present this as power assuming a 50 ohm flat load.

The 0.18 dB mismatch loss is probably lost forever (the actual RF power was probably never brought into existence for the most likely scenario). But this 0.18 dB is swamped by some of the factors I've already mentioned.



RE: Mismatch transmission losses and effects on maximum power output of SSPA

don't forget that VSWR's multiply.
When connecting an amp to antenna, energy will bounce back and forth between the two and with any bandwidth at all, you'll see some real ripples in maximum power out the antenna.
Power transmission Ripple due to VSWR interactions result in ripple spacing across frequency, peak to minimum power(in ghz) will be 8/cable length(inches), assuming teflon cable.

To optimize output power at a certain frequency, change/optimize the transmission line lengths on both sides of the isolatorm. Don't forget teflon cables change thru phase versus temp. 70F to 50F can see significant phase change in a long cable at high freq. ex, 18 ghz, 50 foot cable, 80 degree phase change, from past recollection.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close