×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Punching shear in beam

Punching shear in beam

Punching shear in beam

(OP)
Can punching shear be a problem in beam if the flexural shear capacity is satisfied? (ie. providing beam ligatures)

RE: Punching shear in beam

Aimmee,

Yes, if the beam is wide enough compared to the support width for there to be a critical shear plane transverse to the beam direction.
This must be checked for Band beams which are normally wide and shallow.

RE: Punching shear in beam

(OP)
Thanks, RAPT
If punching shear has to be checked, would you treat it as punching shear in a flat plate? Would you consider the effect of flexural shear reinforcement in the check? If yes, how does the code include the shear reinforcement?

RE: Punching shear in beam

In my experience, if you are supporting the beams directly onto a pile, then the loads will be reasonably small. In this case, due to the depth of the beam being, generally, thicker than a slab or base for the given load then punching shear should not be much of a problem. A check is required, of course!

If the reactions from the beam grillage are high enough to cause a punching shear problem then you would be better of with a pile cap.

RE: Punching shear in beam

Aimmee,

Yes, the check would be the same as for a Flat Plate or a Flat Slab but based on the overall depth.

If punching reinforcement is needed, I would think you could include the flexural shear reinforcement on the faces where it is required for the extent of the punching perimeter in your calculation of the area of punching reinforcement to add. Your flexural shear reinforcement will be full width of the beam but you should only consider that which is in the punching zone.

Another solution, if the concrete shape is not fixed, would be to add a Drop panel to the soffit of the beam at the support (as you would do for a Flat Slab but only for the width of the beam, not L/3). This would have several effects for you, reducing flexural reinforcement, increasing flexural and punching shear capacity and reducing deflections. THis would be preferrable as detailing punching shear reinforcement will not be easy.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close