×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

sizing tubing for a hydraulic system- line losses

sizing tubing for a hydraulic system- line losses

sizing tubing for a hydraulic system- line losses

(OP)
In designing a fluid power system, Parker (catalog 4300) recommends specific line speeds for pressure, return and intake. Seems simple, which I like...

An SSP design handbook has a table which correlates pressure loss per foot of pipe and flow rate with tube size.  What I see looking at this table is:  as flow area increases for a given line speed, pressure losses per foot *greatly* decrease.  Especially in the size range where I am concerned (low HP systems).  I assume (I know...) this table comes from bernouli eqns.

I also notice in lines over about 1/2", 25 fps line speeds are in the turbulent regime, but line losses still tend to decrease with increasing flow area.  

I tend to design to acceptable losses, as opposed to the parker method.  I'm not quite sure what to make to the turbulent flow issue- my only thought here is that turbulent flow would tend to erode lines from the inside, but again I am making as a$$ of myself by assuming that erosion is very long term issue, which will out-survive the rest of my equipment.

so, how can Parker, the god of hydraulics, make such a simplification?  am I missing something?  what about turbulent flow?

please discuss and enlighten me!

thanks in advance!

RE: sizing tubing for a hydraulic system- line losses

You can design however you like.  Parker and others, see Gates nomograph which is typical, use fluid power recommended fluid velocities to prevent turbulent flow and prevent excessive pressure loss(wasted energy).
http://www.gates.com/downloads/download_common.cfm?file=NomographicChart.pdf&folder=brochure&location_id=3047

Energy or power and pressure loss varies with the square of the velocity, that's why small changes in area can result in large changes in wasted energy and pressure loss.

Ted

RE: sizing tubing for a hydraulic system- line losses

Correction: energy loss varies with the velocity.  Velocity varies with the square of the conductor diameter.  A small change in diameter results in a large change in velocity.
Sorry.

Ted

RE: sizing tubing for a hydraulic system- line losses

(OP)
I realize I can design however I like! winky smile  I am just asking if I am missing something.  I am somewhat of a generalist, though I really enjoy my hydraulic projects, and want to be thorough.  

as an example, (and I probably need to run some calculations to verify the validity of the SSP table, from whence this data came):

at 25fps line speed:
1/4" x .049 tube, delta P = ~24psi/ft
3/8" x .049 tube, delta P = ~7psi/ft
1/2" x .049 tube, dP = ~6.6psi/ft, TURBULENT FLOW
...
1.0" x.049 tube, dP=~2psi/ft, turbulent flow

so what I'm seeing here is: designing to 25fps does not in itself yield a universally low pressure loss (by an order of magnitude), 25fps does indeed yield turbulent flow at larger line sizes and turbulent flow does not yield as much losses as I would expect.   

So this leads me to perhaps my real question:  why a suggested fluid velocity at all? or am I still missing something?



 

RE: sizing tubing for a hydraulic system- line losses

At 25 fps, actually a little lower, acoustic flow noise becomes objectionable in otherwise quiet environments.  If that's not an issue in your application, go ahead and dissipate some energy to save weight or space.

 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: sizing tubing for a hydraulic system- line losses

1) Parker are not gods of fluid power, they have grown by acquisition of other established fluid power solutions providers. They like to think they own the fluid power business...but they don't.

2) The turbulent flow charts are derived from mainly Moody's data and Reynolds numbers.

3) There is nothing wrong with turbulent flow if you can handle the power loss.

4) Turbulent flow can help is some cases. More responsive system. Less dirt in the system as it is harder for debris to settle.

5) Fluid Velocity details are guidelines, not rules.   

RE: sizing tubing for a hydraulic system- line losses

Many of the 'rules of thumb' were established so that designers and salespeople and mechanics could size lines and hoses without understanding reynolds numbers, laminar and turbulence, etc etc.
And realistically, they ROT were usually quite 'good enough.'

They are also faster and simpler to use without calculating line losses, which I have found to be sort of a shot in the dark at times depending on assumptions with viscosity and temperature.
Always seems a bit odd to me to calculate line loss but then have a sharp 90 elbow that isn't accounted for.

I use the velocity calcs as a guide, because they are quick and easy, tempering it with a judgment of when a line is 'long' and when the number of fittings becomes significiant.

Suction or case drain lines are a different matter and I look quite closely at those, although usually judgement and velocity and specific gravity only, not calculations.

+1 on Parker comments. They are good in their niches, but not gods. They have good products but are big because of PacMan gobbling up every smaller company in sight. The website absolutely sucks for organization and to find a product. Even my local Parker rep uses the paper catalogs many times a day.







 

RE: sizing tubing for a hydraulic system- line losses

(OP)
thanks everyone, enlightening points all around.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Strategies to Secure Connected Cars with Firewalls
White-hat hackers have demonstrated gaining remote access to dashboard functions and transmissions of connected vehicles. That makes a firewall a vital component of a multilayered approach to vehicle security as well as overall vehicle safety and reliability. Learn strategies to secure with firewalls. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - What is Generative Design and Why Do You Need It?
Engineers are being asked to produce more sophisticated designs under a perfect storm of complexity, cost, and change management pressures. Generative design empowers automotive design teams to navigate this storm by employing automation, data re-use and synchronization, and framing design in the context of a full vehicle platform. Download Now
eBook - Simulation-Driven Design with SOLIDWORKS
Simulation-driven design can reduce the time and cost of product development. In this engineering.com eBook, we’ll explore how SOLIDWORKS users can access simulation-driven design through the SOLIDWORKS Simulation suite of analysis tools. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close