×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Molten Sulfur Trench
2

Molten Sulfur Trench

Molten Sulfur Trench

(OP)
We currently have stainless steel lined concrete trench system with steam coil where we dump sulfur cars into.  These trenches are sloped to a sulfur pit for storage and transfer to the process units.  I am working on the design and installation of a new facility for another 350 feet of additional trench system.

Has anyone out there had any experience to possibly use jacketted (for steam) stainless steel piping to accomplish this?  I got to believe that it would be a much simpler design to deal with a lets say 30" diameter ss pipe than lining a 40x40 inch trench.  we also need to consider expansion joints with either design.   
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Molten Sulfur Trench

You might want to look at what the folks at CSI (Controls Southeast Inc) can do for you here.

My gut reaction is that jacketed stainless steel piping in the size that you are talking about might not be as cost effective as one would initially hope, but I have never done it before.

Regards,

SNORGY.

RE: Molten Sulfur Trench

I seem to remeber that we used aluminium jacketed piping (LP steam) for this purpose- rundown from a Claus unit, but that was 10/12 ins max. Like Snorgy, I have never seen anything this size before. You must wan tto dump a car pretty quickly.

RE: Molten Sulfur Trench

Amiraz,  Most folks who offload sulfur are using jacketed hoses or jacketed arms that feed into a common header.  I would consider your situation unique.  

Probably the most efficient and effective way to do this is a method that is not a regular practice anymore in sulfur industry(gut trace).  Run a 2 inch steam pipe down the center of your carrier pipe to heat the sulfur, then insulate the process pipe with the best practical method.  This is good because no matter how much the outer wall cools, you will always have some flow in the center.  The drawback is corrosion of the inner "gut line".

The second most effective method would be jacketing or using a high-performance heat tracing like QMax (newer) or carbon steel tracing (older and more established) to heat the carrier pipe.  This would require a more effective insulation method since the heat source is on the outer wall.

Hope this helps.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close