JAE
Structural
- Jun 27, 2000
- 15,594
As part of a small structural engineering consulting firm, we typically design things like buildings and bridges that are one-time, one-shot things. We do the design and they build our design.
Our insurance and exposure to risk is based on this idea of a one-time construction of a singular entity.
We have an opportunity to design a product that depends on our engineering design...i.e. it is a product that is primarily developed through structural engineering, which we do.
The product will be eventually marketed and sold to contractors and used on construction sites.
We have discussed the fact that with 100's of these products out there we would have a magnified exposure to risk. We would have no control over the use of these things.
We thought about establishing a separate company to limit our original firm's risk - but not sure if that makes sense.
Any thoughts on this?
Our insurance and exposure to risk is based on this idea of a one-time construction of a singular entity.
We have an opportunity to design a product that depends on our engineering design...i.e. it is a product that is primarily developed through structural engineering, which we do.
The product will be eventually marketed and sold to contractors and used on construction sites.
We have discussed the fact that with 100's of these products out there we would have a magnified exposure to risk. We would have no control over the use of these things.
We thought about establishing a separate company to limit our original firm's risk - but not sure if that makes sense.
Any thoughts on this?