×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

AWD Pushrod front suspension design

AWD Pushrod front suspension design

AWD Pushrod front suspension design

(OP)
Hey Everyone,

So I have tried to do some searching but haven't come up with concrete information.  My only current book is Chassis Engineering by Herb Adams which is no help in this question.

I wanted to ask people with first hand knowledge of this.  I am looking to build an AWD tube chassis super car and for packaging purposes I believe a pushrod design will be necessary.  Unfortunately there are not a lot of real world examples I can use to copy.

I was looking at the Aventador suspension for inspiration and I was wondering does the angle of the pushrod matter as long as the bellcrank is at the same angle as well?

It seems the ideal(common) design has the push rod originating from the center of the lower control arm at an angle to pass the axle up to the bell crank.  I was thinking why not use a pushrod that is offset either to the left or right side of the control arm so the pushrod is moving 100% vertical with the suspension.  I assume this is because a torque would be caused about the axle centerline if you have it offset?  Or is it some other issue?

I have seen rear pushrod setups with offset rods but they also have lateral links and the upright does not turn.

Is it also not possible to mount the pushrod to the top control arm to transmit the movement?  What is the issue with doing this?  Clearly there must be a disadvantage for people to avoid it.

Lastly, what type of connection would you recommend for the pushrod ends?  A Heim joint?

Sorry for all the questions I just don't see a lot of examples of this and figured this would be the best place to ask.

thanks for the help! Any other suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

reference images I have found:

32 hot rod


Aventador:


full link to lambo setup: http://blogs.insideline.com/straightline/2011/09/2012-lamborghini-aventador-suspension-walkaround.html

Ben

 

RE: AWD Pushrod front suspension design

Just a quick note before more knowledgeable members join in. Re. attaching pushrod to upper control arm- you have a terminology  issue here... Most commonly, when such mechanism is attached to the upper control arm the bellcrank is usually placed below the control arm and then the link is being pulled instead of pushed in bump, and then it's called pullrod, not pushrod. I think Newey's most recent Red Bull F1 cars feature such design on rear suspension.

RE: AWD Pushrod front suspension design

Wolf you are partially correct.  You can still have a pushrod system by placing the attachment on top of the A-Arm. You could do it several ways but the a-arm would incorporate both the a-arm function and bell crank function in one part. Early F1 cars did this in the 60's or so.   

RE: AWD Pushrod front suspension design

Hehe, but it doesn't have a rod in it. (if it's what I'm thinking about, like Lotus 25 front suspension with inboard mounted coil-overs... it seems to me the downside might be maximum bending momentum on that control arm) On a more serious note, Pagani Zonda used proper bell-crank shaped UCA on rear suspension, as can be seen here: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_hHNtbIcXaA0/TULfWj816OI/AAAAAAAAADA/e114JlW_PWk/s1600/0410_17z%252BPagani_Zonda_C12_S%252BUnderhood_Engine_Suspension.jpg .

There was a variation of pullrod mechanism in early '70ies*- a bit earlier than, in my knowledge, 'proper' pushrod/pullrod linkages were used, designed by Len Terry in order to get a progressive spring characteristic. I think he might have designed it as an improvement of rather complex progressive rate system one of McLaren F1 cars used in '71... It didn't use bellcrank as one would expect, so I'll attach a picture in case it's of any interest.

RE: AWD Pushrod front suspension design

(OP)
Thanks WolfHR, that is actually like a design I was thinking of(on the Pagani but obviously not exactly like that).  

In terms of the terminology I still don't understand how the setup on the Zonda would be a pull rod setup.  Unless in this situation the control arm is technically the "pushrod" and they don't count that...

Is there an issue in terms of motion?  As in would this be less than a 1:1 ratio?  I would assume it would be very slightly less than 1:1 if you had unequal A arms.  Would this cause a potential issue and if it is can a 1:1 ratio be re-captured with the right bell crank geometry?

thanks again for the help this is giving me great design ideas.

Ben

RE: AWD Pushrod front suspension design

(OP)
The reason there is discussion on motion ratio though is to achieve acceptable amount of travel correct?

I assume you want to avoid a situation where you say only have half the motion of the wheel translated to the suspension otherwise you need twice the spring rate/damping ability?

thanks for the help and input!

Ben

RE: AWD Pushrod front suspension design

Try four times the rate . . .


Norm

RE: AWD Pushrod front suspension design

(OP)
^^^Was that supposed to be a helpful suggestion or a challenge, I'm not sure what your intent was.

thanks

Ben

RE: AWD Pushrod front suspension design

(OP)
Good to know thanks I assumed that was the other possibility haha.  It's been years since I did any real engineering calculations(obviously). Luckily I did find a lot of my old engineering textbooks from when I was in ME to reference but I figure a lot of this specific motorsports info is not available in those. I have a large cart full of books to order on amazon as well.

I think I like the design and simplicity of the Pagani upper control arm design as it was close to what I originally envisioned but wondered why more people did not utilize it like on the Aventador if it was a viable solution.

thanks again for the help, this will be a long project but it will be fun.

Ben

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close