We have a simple circuit that consits of a line (feeder?) at 480v, and a parallel circuit, we'd call a branch, with a low SCCR. My understanding is that SB4.4.1 does not allow you to consider the current limiting capabilities of a current limiting fuse when it's located in a branch. I've been told this by 2 separate people from UL. I think if you read SB4.4.1 you might be able to get that from the text but it certainly doesn't say it in plain terms. Can some verify that this understanding is correct? Effectively, it means that you need CL protection ahead of a CL fuse in a branch. Or in our case, truely redundant fuses. Why have they denied the ability of a CL fuse to limit current just based on it's location in the circuit?
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
Simulation is an increasingly valuable tool across the product design workflow, but not all simulations are equal. We set out to determine how engineers and product designers make use of specialized analyses, how they incorporate nonlinear simulation into their work and how they rate the available software. Download Now
Our data is constantly exposed to the danger of being intercepted or stolen as it wends its way over global data networks. Data security measures and measures for protecting intellectual property should not, however, first be implemented when data is exchanged – companies must lay the foundation for these measures within their own organization. Download Now