×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

CF8M (316) Magnetic?
2

CF8M (316) Magnetic?

CF8M (316) Magnetic?

(OP)
I was about to condemn a strainer that was ordered as 316SS because it was magnetic and did not recognize the CF8M designation until later looking it up.

Should I condemn it anyway, as it is magnetic?  Should I get it more thoroughly analyzed?  Is there something in the casting process that imbues magnetic properties in 316?

RE: CF8M (316) Magnetic?

2
CF8M is not just cast 316. It has a lot more silicon for castability. Plus, as a casting, it has not had the high temperature soaking and working that wrought 316 gets, that causes the normal as-cast ferrite to homoginize into austenite by diffusion.
  The normal level of ferrite is between 5 and 20% in this cast alloy. It should not be viewed as harmful. In fact, you're essentially getting a duplex grade for free. This structure is very effective in preventing SCC. And the partion ratios of the elements work out that both phases have good and equivalent corrosion resistance.
  So, don't condemn. Spare the lowly foundryman. That's just the way the grade is supposed to be.

RE: CF8M (316) Magnetic?

CF8M is an as cast alloy containing larger amounts of silicon and manganese than in 316 alloys. It seldom shows magnetic properties as compared to CF8. Perhaps the casting was heavily ground or that during shotblasting if the steel shot dust got deposited.Normally in our country sand blasting is resorted to for ss castings to overcome this problem.

The foundryman has always been the butt of all shortcomings vastly due to the ignorance of the end user in understanding the limitations of the casting process and the difficulties encountered in processing.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close