×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Strength Reduction in Fire Damaged Steel Beams

Strength Reduction in Fire Damaged Steel Beams

Strength Reduction in Fire Damaged Steel Beams

(OP)
I have steel beams that have undergone a fire.  They were wrapped with drywall and the building was not very big so they probably did not get very hot.  I have been asked by the insurance adjuster if the beams can be reused.  

Question: Is the post-fire strength of steel beams reduced from their pre-fire condition?  If so, by how much?

Any help or direction is appreciated

RE: Strength Reduction in Fire Damaged Steel Beams

There was a good article on this subject in the AISC Engineering Journal, First Quarter, 1998 titled "Integrity of Structural Steel after Exposure to Fire" by R.H.R. Tide.
His final conclusion was "it can be simply stated: 'If it is still straight after exposure to fire - the steel is OK.'"

RE: Strength Reduction in Fire Damaged Steel Beams

When steel comes out of a rolling mill it is molten.  We certainly don't throw it away because it was so hot.

When we weld, the weld metal is molten.  Once it cools it has strength.

I agree with AJH1.

RE: Strength Reduction in Fire Damaged Steel Beams

Generally mild steel rolled sections will be ok providing they are straight. Be carefull of Cold Worked sections - cold working in effect turns mild steel into high tensile steel which can revert back to mild steel if it gets hot enough. The same can apply to some high tensile steel bolts - check the capacity of the connections assuming that they are ordinary grade bolts and if in doubt replace them.

please forgive my over simplification of terms - remember  that American engineers and British engineers are seperated by a common language - we have different terms for the same things.

RE: Strength Reduction in Fire Damaged Steel Beams

Let me put it in thi way. At the time of rolling for required shapes , it is in ideal condition in a controlled teparature. It has its full properties per standards.

Once it is affected with fire under loading conditions, its properties were lost and deformed in to different textures. Better to go for testing with present conditions and decide for reusage. For a physical test and judgement ,  I fully agree with Mr.Ajh1

RE: Strength Reduction in Fire Damaged Steel Beams

I would recommend testing if your not sure, it's cheap insurance and simple mechanical tests are not too expensive.
Unless you know specifically the temperature and time the steel was exposed, you really are not sure.

I have seen beams that were "straight" after fire damage that did not comply with the original specification requirements. The beams were supported in a manner that did not divulge deformation to the eye. We cut samples of material in locations chosen by the RDP for that project. I believe his locations were based upon a fire investigators report. Steel in the areas not considered "damaged" (but were still exposed to fire), the material was right were it should have been metallurgically speaking.

Coupons were cut at web or flange of the beams and a few columns. These were sent to a local construction lab for the usual tensile/yield, toughness and hardness. I remember one beam which had 2 coupons removed had one that was satisfactory, the other failed as it had failed the Charpy impact. Both coupons were removed from the center of the web. It was supposed to be our "control" unit as a comparison.

The specific test results were random. Some were satisfactory, some were not. The metallurgical engineer made recommendations to R&R some of these members.

It's cheap insurance.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close