×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

No Stress Peaks

No Stress Peaks

No Stress Peaks

(OP)
Does any one know of a method to design a gas turbine or compressor blade so that under a combined tension (CF) and gas bending load the traditional located stress peaks at LE,TE and Blade to Platform are avoided.

RE: No Stress Peaks

(OP)
Thanks Greg, how about avoiding the fillets

RE: No Stress Peaks

Apsu,

Put the blade in compressive preload.

Regards,
Terry

RE: No Stress Peaks

"avoided" ... no
"reduced" ... possibly

maybe terry's suggestion ... shot-peen (or Hot Isostatic Pressure) the surfaces, interference fit the blades into the hub.  but this'll create different problems with the hot turbine blades (obviously ?)

but then i'm not sure how these suggestions would work with single crystal blades ??

bit surprised that your stress peaks are at teh L/E and T/E ... i'd've thought you had more of a problem with normal bending of the blade ... just my 2c

RE: No Stress Peaks

(OP)
Hi Terry
Your suggestion about compressive preload is interesting particularly if I consider a ceramic blade design as crack fracture growth would be minimised. I am not aware of any nozzle guide vane to turbine blade configuration that would offer the compressive blade scenario. The Turbine blades would have to rotate on the outside with the tips pointing inwards, whilst NGV remain static.

I need to think about a suitable configuration more .

Regards
Apsu

RE: No Stress Peaks

(OP)
Thanks RB1957

Yes, I agree a great reduction of kt can be achieved by traditional geometric adjustments that usually involve some form of fillet.

Applying a compressive stress by shot peening as you suggest, into an area prone to kt maybe a consideration, it would preload the region and reduce the kt effects.

If fillets can be avoided its also a manufacturing benefit as it reduces the steps to production by not only one, but removes the need to confirm quality control on the fillet consistency.

I get kt more in the trailing edge (and some LE)and root of the Divergent blade design. The loading is combined.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close