Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Register Log in
  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

IBC 1805.5 "Lateral Support"

Status
Not open for further replies.
MCurry

MCurry

Structural
Mar 19, 2003
34
Hello everyone,

I've been pushed (once again) by our local concrete contractor to allow a basement wall to be built according to IBC minimums (Tables 1805.1(1) through 1805.5 (5).
1805.5 states that the tables may be used when the top and bottom of the wall is laterally supported.
With a building 80 feet long, 30 feet deep and a walk-out basement, I say the floor does not constitute "lateral support" but would love to find a definitive code reference.
Is there an IBC white paper or something that anyone is aware of. I'm tired of having this argument!

Thanks all.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Sort by date Sort by votes
I am new here, but here is my two cent. Section 2306.3, Wood Diaphragms, outlines maximum shear loads in pounds per foot of horizontal wood diaphragms (framed floors). If this section is applied to the design of the floor diaphragm the loads will likely exceed those prescribed in section 2306.3, therefore supporting that case that the wall is not braced at the top.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
At 30 psf/ft, the wall generates 320#/ft at the top to the diaphragm, yielding a diaphragm shear of 428#/ft which is very doable if blocked and nailed properly. Higher loads will give proportionately higher shears. The chord force is 8.5 kips that can be handled with the wall top steel.

Presently, outside of tolerable diaphragm deflections, I do not see a problem with using the diaphragm for wall restraint.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto: KISS
Motivation: Don't ask
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
With the foundation factor of .56, the maximum allowable long term shear is about 460 plf, doable, but barely.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto: KISS
Motivation: Don't ask
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Not sure where 30 psf/ft came from. ASCE and the IBC prescribe a minimum of 35 psf/ft for washed stone type fill, the footnotes will require an even higher load, but IMO an over design. The prescriptive design of the IBC (connections) does not transfer the stresses from the foundation wall to the diaphragm adequately nor the loads from the diaphragm to the shear walls. 1/2 anchor bolts at at 6' o.c. For a one story home?? I hate seeing basement wall dseigns with top of wall loads shown and then "by others"
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I think it would help if the code defined "lateral support" more precisely. Something like "the prescriptive tables may be used when lateral support of adequate strength and stiffness to resist the applied earth pressure without excessive deflection is in place at the top and bottom of the wall".
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

marshalman
  • Locked
  • Question
IBC/IEBC Foundation Soil Testing
Replies
1
Views
667
phamENG
phamENG
VXL
  • Locked
  • Question
2015-IBC/Section 1011.6 Stairway landing 1
2
Replies
23
Views
3K
dauwerda
dauwerda
ramihabchi
  • Locked
  • Question
IBC and international codes 2
Replies
6
Views
555
phamENG
phamENG
ramihabchi
  • Locked
  • Question
snow load according to IBC outside US
Replies
1
Views
293
klaus.
klaus.
cap4000
  • Locked
  • Question
2015 IBC Scissor Stair Issue 4 Story Condo
Replies
1
Views
376
Bagman2524
Bagman2524

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top Bottom