Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Appendix 2, Fig. 2-4, Sketch 11
- Thread starter BigTank
- Start date
BigTank,
Suggest you design the flange as 'ring type integral', not 'ring type loose'. If you try 'ring type loose' you will have a problem defining the flange ID in COMPRESS since it will be smaller than the shell OD. For 'ring type integral' the design calculations are the same as Fig. 2-4 Sketch (8)thru (10a) but you will need to be sure the attachment weld meets the referenced requirements of Sketch(11). You may need to adjust the weld size in COMPRESS.
Don Kurle PE
Codeware Technical Support
Suggest you design the flange as 'ring type integral', not 'ring type loose'. If you try 'ring type loose' you will have a problem defining the flange ID in COMPRESS since it will be smaller than the shell OD. For 'ring type integral' the design calculations are the same as Fig. 2-4 Sketch (8)thru (10a) but you will need to be sure the attachment weld meets the referenced requirements of Sketch(11). You may need to adjust the weld size in COMPRESS.
Don Kurle PE
Codeware Technical Support
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question