×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Flange corrosion allowance on bore

Flange corrosion allowance on bore

Flange corrosion allowance on bore

(OP)
I'm wondering if anyone else noticed this, and if anyone can straighten out my logic if need be.

Examining the Compress calcs for an integral ring-type flange shows that the BORE corrosion allowance is applied in several places as if this corrosion allowance were not for the bore dimension but for the radial thickness dimension (as is the case for a shell [thickness]).

Re-stated: if the vessel shell corrosion allowance is 1/16", then the corrosion allowance on the bore dimension of that shell would be 1/8".

It appears that in Compress this BORE corrosion allowance is being treated as if it were the shell corrosion allowance (applied to a radial thickness).  For example, Compress uses the BORE corrosion allowance on the shell thickness g0 for a ring-type integral flange calculation, thus actually applying twice the desired corrosion allowance.

Similar application is seen in calculating hD, hT, HD, and the factor h0.

This seems incorrect.  Am I correct that this is incorrect, or do I need corrected?

--------------------------------
Fitter, happier, more productive

RE: Flange corrosion allowance on bore

in calcs....CA should be 1/16" everywhere

yes bore will go out an 1/8" larger...1/16" on each side

RE: Flange corrosion allowance on bore

(OP)
Precisely, vesselfab.  But Compress is doubling the 1/16, calling it correctly by the 'bore corrosion allowance' moniker, but applying this now doubled CA to one shell thickness when used as an integral hub to a flange.

--------------------------------
Fitter, happier, more productive

RE: Flange corrosion allowance on bore

hmmm

my compress does not do this

have you got the 1/16" ca as a global ca and calling out for another 1/16" in nozzle calcs?

RE: Flange corrosion allowance on bore

(OP)
i guess my point is that, when editing the flange in the model, there is a box for 'corrosion    bore'.  in that box is the 1/8 as determined per discussion above, but it's taking the undertoleranced pipe used for the shell as the integral flange hub, and deducting 1/8.  i wish i could upload some screenshots and/or a portion of the calcs to show you.

that is, if i enter the corrosion allowance in the appropriate box for a given model component, any global setting should be overridden for that component.

--------------------------------
Fitter, happier, more productive

RE: Flange corrosion allowance on bore

(OP)
in addition, it seems to be applying this thicker corrosion allowance on its own whim throughout the calcs.  perhaps i should email the model to Tom...

--------------------------------
Fitter, happier, more productive

RE: Flange corrosion allowance on bore

the corrosion on bore is 1/16"

not 1/8


go to set options

nozzles 2 tab

click on  set corrosion allowance same as parent

RE: Flange corrosion allowance on bore

(OP)
but my problem is with body flanges, not nozzles.

my ca on the tab you mention is set to 0.  the 1/8 came into the flanges automatically.

something else i should mention is that this particular model in which i discovered the problem is an exchanger.

nevertheless, 'ca bore' implies a ca applied to the bore dimension whereas, in the radial direction, the code applies the ca to one vessel thickness, not both across the cross-section.  either Compress has a misidentification of the ca in the flange component windows (which seems most likely), or the calcs aren't using it correctly.  at least that seems to be the obvious problem...i'm just looking for confirmation or denial.

man i wish i could upload some files!  IT is pretty tight here...

--------------------------------
Fitter, happier, more productive

RE: Flange corrosion allowance on bore

(OP)
so did we come to a consensus?

--------------------------------
Fitter, happier, more productive

RE: Flange corrosion allowance on bore

(OP)
okay.  over the past 8 work hours i've answered my own question:

it appears that the label in Compress for this particular corrosion allowance parameter is misleading, especially when considered in conjunction with the automatic input of corrosion allowance into the flanges from the heat exchanger input.  for example, if i enter heat exchanger information with a corrosion allowance of 1/16" shell-side, all of the shell-side body flanges will have their 'corrosion allowance   bore' parameters automatically populated with 1/8", leading one to believe that this automatically populated value is applied to the bore DIMENSION.  but the reality of the calculations is that the value in the 'c.a.   bore' box is applied through the calcs "per-side" so-to-speak (only to the thickness dimension not the bore dimension as implied).

i hope my headache helps someone else along the way.  i can't be the only one that noticed this.

 

--------------------------------
Fitter, happier, more productive

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close