×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Fee development for structural design criteria services
3

Fee development for structural design criteria services

Fee development for structural design criteria services

(OP)
Our company has been given the opprotunity to develop a fee proposal for a fairly large project.  The scope of services at this point is to develop the design criteria for the project as the local specialized firm.  We do not know at this point whether or not our team will be awarded the design as well so we have been asked to keep the two separate. Does anyone have any ideas on how to properly develop a fee for the design criteria phase of the project?  We have taken the approach of estimating the total anticipated man hours to develop the criteria but suspect that, from a risk management standpoint, the fee should be greater based on our company's exposure especially if we are not awarded the design in the next phase of the project.
Any input would be greatly appreciated.

RE: Fee development for structural design criteria services

Trychnos,
I do not understand the structural "design criteria". call me wierd, but i have done many diffrent things under this heading.

1. Does this mean you will be providing input into a "design brief for structural components" for architectural, structural, civil and services for a D&C tender, aka say it is a processing plant are you to provide gather and report the expected heating and cool effects for concrete design ect?
2. Alternatively, is your input more complex like development on the architectural for building concept, ie slab thickness, column size and positions ect, aka processing plant again, to you help in the layout of the structure?
3. Alternatively is your input less complex, building a design criteria report like Woolworths throws out each time they do a development, mainly in relation for minimum specification.
For 1 & 3. Your liability would be minimal, generally, we would price this as an investigation and report, thus it would be man-hours x 2.5.
2. Your liability is medium, and your advice has to be such that an engineer in the future can take you preliminary design and develop it. Generally would try to do this as a $$$/HR, if not possible i would go for 0.5% of estimated total construction costs or man-hours x 5. I say your liability is medium because if you do not do it well and another firm rips your design up, you look bad, so good development is a high priority, and you can waste time here, lots of time.  

When in doubt, just take the next small step.
 

RE: Fee development for structural design criteria services

(OP)
rowingengineer
Thank you for the information.  Based on current scope we fall between 1 and 3.  However, I'll probably include provisions in the proposal in case the scope expands to something like 2. At that point we can obtain additional compensation for the expanded scope.
Thank you for the information.  It was helpful.

RE: Fee development for structural design criteria services

Caring of future liabilities, I would state within the "design criteria" that the firm commissioned in the end with the design shall be responsible of meeting all and every of the specific legal and technical requirements in the scope of the commission that are not generally or specifically addressed in your "design criteria", which are, of course, also to be complied with. This way, you direct the way the works must be conducted yet who takes the money, takes the liability. In short, you give advice and guidelines to the development of the work (acting as complementary rules), useful and helpful to meet intent, but just that. Meeting the design intent is just the purpose of an engineering commission.

RE: Fee development for structural design criteria services

(OP)
Thank you ishvaaag.  This is also helpful.

RE: Fee development for structural design criteria services

I may be overthinking this, but I question the Clients intent. Why did they go to you, the local specialized firm for design criteria only?

Is it to get your expertice for less fee and then hire a firm better connected (and controlled) with the Architect or the Client?

I would try very hard to find out why you can not have the total project even if bid in two phases. Your effort here may draw out the Client's motive. At least include some kind of monetary incentive for getting the total job after the first phase. ie: Markup the value of your expertise with a discount for full design and tell them so.

Good luck. Let us know the outcome.  

RE: Fee development for structural design criteria services

(OP)
Thank you SteelyLee.  We will keep this in mind and look into it further.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close