×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Rounding of Dual Dimension Tols?

Rounding of Dual Dimension Tols?

Rounding of Dual Dimension Tols?

(OP)
If my primary dimensions are in MM and my secondary dimensions are INCHES in dual dimensioning, if I have a tolerance of 0.05mm it shows as 0.001" instead of rounding up to 0.002".  Is there a way to fix this?

RE: Rounding of Dual Dimension Tols?

Pro/E always rounds secondary units so the tolerance range is smaller than the primary units.  .002" > .05 mm

You can either increase the primary tolerance to .051 mm which will round to .002" or increase the number of decimals on the secondary units to 4 in which case .05 mm will round to .0019".

RE: Rounding of Dual Dimension Tols?

I have the same problem. mm is primary, inch is secondary. When I have tolerance -0,38 in primary, I have -0,014 in secondary. Why? If make right round-up it must be -0,015 (0,38/25,4=0,01496...). I can't write -0,381 becouse it, first of all, not right. Second - it mean that measuring tool must be 0,0001 class. It is expensive. Anyway, I think that this is mistake.

RE: Rounding of Dual Dimension Tols?

No, it is intended functionality.  If the -,38 mm primary were rounded to -0.015" secondary you could accept parts measured in the secondary units that would be rejected in the primary units.  

Dual dimensioning is almost always a mistake IMHO.   

RE: Rounding of Dual Dimension Tols?

Since the secondary units are not judged, I don't see why that would be an issue.  I do not believe secondary unit represent a second set of allowable specifications.  If the tols on the drawing are in mm's, then that is what applied...especially if using standard ISO tol charts.

Secondly, I should point out that dual dimensioning is no longer supported by ASME, prolly for reasons like the ones mentioned in this thread.

Personally, I would pick one set of units and stick to it.

Matt Lorono
CAD Engineer/ECN Analyst
Silicon Valley, CA
Lorono's SolidWorks Resources
Co-moderator of Solidworks Yahoo! Group
and Mechnical.Engineering Yahoo! Group

RE: Rounding of Dual Dimension Tols?

(OP)
heh, I knew the "Don't Dual Dimension" statements would come to this post and almost asked them not to be said.  Sadly, some engineers don't get to make the decisions themselves whether to dual dim or not... no matter how hard they try to convince their superiors.

Thanks for the summary of what's wrong with the secondary, that totally makes sense why they don't round up as you wouldn't want the parts to be accepted at a higher tolerance than you intended.

RE: Rounding of Dual Dimension Tols?

Dual dimensions are just a reference people.  If you want metric, design in metric and vice versa.  Don't use the converted dimensions to manufacture to.  You'll end up with scrap.  Stop using the crutch and stick to one.

 

--
Fighter Pilot
Manufacturing Engineer

RE: Rounding of Dual Dimension Tols?

Dual dimensions are not reference dimensions.  Unfortunately, you do sometimes get the problem where a part is designed with  one set of units & must fit other parts designed in the same units but the part is manufactured & inspected in a foreign country using another unit system.  If you are in that situation it is better to use Pro/E's dual dimension functionality than depend on someone you have never met, in a foreign country, performing the calculations manually.

I agree you can't always avoid them but they are still a problem waiting to happen.  I find increasing the number of decimal places is the best thing to avoid roundoff error.  And always use explicit tolerances rather than default tolerances as they can really bite you.  

RE: Rounding of Dual Dimension Tols?

(OP)
@fighterpilot:

The reason my company uses them is the projects and parts are always time critical, they never want a part to come in late only because a machine shop tried to convert them from metric to english and someone made a calculation error... sure it's their fault but my company will still have to pay in the end due to the project being delayed...

now you'll say "find a company that can do metric" and I say, go run your own business.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close