×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Chemical Composition of in-house Stainless Steel Fastener

Chemical Composition of in-house Stainless Steel Fastener

Chemical Composition of in-house Stainless Steel Fastener

(OP)
I am looking for third party verification of the composition of a Stainless Steel stand-off.  I will list below the major components and would appreciate any one that could verify if it is so and what variant of stainless steel it would be:

a).  C - 0.04%;
b).  Si - 0.47%;
c).  Mn - 1.74%;
d).  P - 0.022%;
e).  S - 0.26%;
f).  Cr - 17.54%;
g).  Mo - 0.42% &
h).  Ni - 9.33%.

Also, it would be helpful if anyone out here in cyber-land could point to a site that might help in the future.

Best Regards,

Randy Chard

RE: Chemical Composition of in-house Stainless Steel Fastener

I don't have the ASTM fastener specs in front of me, but if it was plate, sheet, etc. it would meet the chemical composition of ASTM A240 type 302.  Nickel is a little bit low to meet type 304 specification.  Fasteners could be different however.

G Roberts

RE: Chemical Composition of in-house Stainless Steel Fastener

GRoberts,
In my opinion, nickel content meets type 304 specification.

Max. 0.15%C for Type 302
Max. 0.08%C for Type 304

It could be AISI Type 304 rather than Type 302.

RE: Chemical Composition of in-house Stainless Steel Fastener

I just came across your old question by chance and have to tell you that what you have is 303. The very high sulfur level confirms that and distinguishes from normal stainless grades. It is a free-machining grade-the sulfur provides that-but you loose a great deat of corrosion resistance because of its presence. It is similar to 302 and 304, but it does not have their corrosion resistance.
          Mike McGuire

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close