×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Constraining and Applying Loads in Pro/M

 Forum Search FAQs Links MVPs

Constraining and Applying Loads in Pro/M

(OP)
The company I work for is looking to simulate what can be considered a 'shock' load on a plate.  What I have is a plate of steel, roughly 12"x12"x1.75" that rolls along a track.  the track is not smooth and at certain point (ie intersection) within the track, the plate will drop slightly (0.004").  We have a plate that is being tested now in our shop with load sensors and have determined that the highest force expeirenced during this drop is roughly 4000 lbs.

What I am trying to do is to simulate what happens as the plate moves through the interesction at the time of the drop.  So the leading edge would experience a load of 4000 lbs being applied upward, while, due to a free body diagram, the trailing edge would experince and simlar force in the opposite direction.

How can I constrain the model to allow it to 'rotate' as it experiences this sudden force?

RE: Constraining and Applying Loads in Pro/M

If I was doing it, I would not apply a force load, but an acceleration load (Gs) to the plate.  The force load tends to go in the directin you want, but acceleration will load the plate so a natural rotation at the pivot point will occure. Applying force per area is more of a situation like haveing sand on top of the plate.  That is my opinion.

For ProM, you would want to constrain the side surface of the plate.  Constrain so that the surface does not go side to side, but free to go up and down and back and forth.  For the rotation, fix rotation for roll and yaw, but keep pitch free to rotate.

Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."

RE: Constraining and Applying Loads in Pro/M

(OP)
so i have placed a 'gravity' load on the ucs of the model.  (9.81 m/s^2 going down and our acceleration rate of the horiztonal movement).  now when i go into the analysis and create a new dynamic analysis, it doesnt give me an option to choose what loads i want to use, only constraints.  does Mechanica automatically use all loads associated with the model?

RE: Constraining and Applying Loads in Pro/M

Well first a correction on my part.  Constrain all sides in all directions, but keep the rotation the same.

Dynamic Analysis is a different animal where you will need a profile to simulate the shock / vibe.

Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!