×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Gravel Pit CN

Gravel Pit CN

Gravel Pit CN

(OP)
Hello,

Does anyone know of a good reference for a curve number (CN) to represent the floor of an actively mined gravel extraction operation?

RE: Gravel Pit CN

A CN value can be estimated from the voids in the gravel, but the underlying material may also be a factor.  See www.hydrocad.net/curvenumber.htm

But first, does the water actually run-off the gravel, or is it all collected in the stone?  And what are you trying to model?  The surface runoff, or the water that is collected in the stone?

RE: Gravel Pit CN

(OP)
Peter, thanks for the response.  The floor of the pit is tightly packed gravel material, which is acting more like impervious area than pervious stone.  I'm attempting to model runoff from the surface.  I've started using a CN of 76 for "gravel roads, A soils".  I've also considered using a CN 98 but I think this is a bit conservative.

RE: Gravel Pit CN

Can you model it in place or is it too large or complicated to do that ? Just wait until it rains, record the rainfall at say, 15 minute intervals, and record the runoff hydrograph(s).

good luck

RE: Gravel Pit CN

Use your Group-A soil values. Why penalize yourself. The curve nos are so radically different (gravel road to A-grass/woods) that you probably had no pre-development runoff and your actual final condition will be essentially the same, just with different slopes. Plus, because of your swing in CNs, the new composite CN would be somewhat higher and the results will say you've now got tons of runoff to deal with post versus none in the pre (not reality).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close