×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

FEA question

FEA question

FEA question

(OP)
Hello,

I'm designing a magnetic device very similar to a speaker circuit (i.e. a bottom and top plate, a central pole, and a ring magnet). The only exception is that I'm adding an  adjustable leakage path on the outside diameter, and inserting a coil in the empty space between the ring magnet and central pole. Also instead of an air gap where the voice coil usually is there will be a somewhat magnetic material.

OK with that said I did a magnetic circuit analysis and then made a spreadsheet so that I could quickly look at the effect of changing variables. After that I used Ansoft's "Maxwell" software to run a 2D (radial) model. The FEA results and my spreadsheet  were in very good agreement. Am  I right to expect that the 2D model in this case is better than a 3D model?

So my other question is how accurate should I expect the model to predict the physical device? Assuming all the B-H curves I used in the analysis accurately reflect the construction materials, and I do indeed construct the device as I modeled it. I've heard that flux densities usually end up being half of what the model predicts.

RE: FEA question

Since your model is rotationally symmetric, the 2D analysis is just as valid (not better) as a 3D analysis would be.

Regarding your question of accuracy: I've found my rotationally symmetric 2D models tend to overestimate forces by 20% to 30%.  I attribute most of that difference to small misalignments in the construction.  It's impossible to keep things perfectly concentric and small shifts can lead to large changes in performance.

As you mentioned, it's also very important to make sure the B-H curves are accurate too.

RE: FEA question

My analysis is generally as close as the accuracy of data can be taken. However that is with circuits with which I have familiarity. 2D is very acceptable if the circuit is as MagMike says rotationally symmetric. Accurate B-H cuves are important. We have developed our own and that improves accuracy. Continue to refine and run your model to improve accuracy. A higher order model and much greater mesh desity is needed when looking at force. The neat part of this is 2D can be run so much faster than 3D. My results are using Infolytica Magnet.

Mike

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close