Moved Thread_NX vs NE vs Algor v.20
Moved Thread_NX vs NE vs Algor v.20
(OP)
I may not be able to post this information in a single post, so let me preface the next several posts by saying that this information was originally posted in the Nastran forum.
Garland E. Borowski, PE
Borowski Engineering & Analytical Services, Inc.
Lower Alabama SolidWorks Users Group
Garland E. Borowski, PE
Borowski Engineering & Analytical Services, Inc.
Lower Alabama SolidWorks Users Group
RE: Moved Thread_NX vs NE vs Algor v.20
To which Toys19 responded as follows:
At this point, please allow me to greatly summarize his points as follows:
1) Meshing. Algor's automesher was deemed superior for two reasons: The ability to mesh complicated geometries that other meshers were unable to mesh and the maximum use of bricks by the solid mesher for improved convergence.
2) Ease of Use. "femap feels clunky compared to algor )not that it doesn't have its faults) but the latest version is very slick";.
3) MES (mechanical event simulation) is excellent.
4) Non-linear solver and materials models excellent, femap is probably more tweakable but we find that we do not need it, and I think Algor has a greater range of materials models anyway
5) Support. ...Pittsburgh based support is comprehensive and dedicated.
Bad points - contact set-up is painful, but massively improved in V20 and further big improvements promised
RE: Moved Thread_NX vs NE vs Algor v.20