Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

Register Log in
  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Replacement 305

Status
Not open for further replies.
Xank

Xank

Materials
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
1
Location
PL
We use SS305 for certain components. For cost reduction, I am planning of using SS204Cu, or maybe SS201.
But with the higher strength of SS201, would I need to modify the tooling?
I would like to use the same set of tools.

Strength is not important for my requirement, I require low magnetic permeability.

What do you suggest?

Also, what is a reliable site to get a rough estimate of stainless steel prices? I am looking for SS434, 400, 201
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
If you require low perm after forming you will not get it with any alternate alloy. the standard 304, 201 and 204 chemistries will be partially magnetic after deformation.
There are special 200 series chemistries that off high formability and low perm, but they are specials.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Ed, is a caveat to your post that the standard alloys would re-attain low permeability if fully annealed after forming? Of course, the cost of heat treating probably negates any savings from switching away from 305.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top