Unbraced length Lu
Unbraced length Lu
(OP)
i am developing a program for steel design using CISC/CSA16.1-94. It is almost complete except that I could not find any formula to calculate Lu (limiting unbraced length) this is equivalent to "Lp" of AISC 360-05, (Lp values from AISC 360-05 are too conservative).
I tried the iteration procedure using Galambos (SSRC) formula for Mu by substuting Mp (plastic) for Mu to obtain Lu, but yeilds a rather too high limiting values.
can anyone help?
I tried the iteration procedure using Galambos (SSRC) formula for Mu by substuting Mp (plastic) for Mu to obtain Lu, but yeilds a rather too high limiting values.
can anyone help?
RE: Unbraced length Lu
Dik
RE: Unbraced length Lu
i think im going to mail the code committee (once i get their address).
RE: Unbraced length Lu
Just like you, I thought Lu is calculated by equating Mu to Mp. Looks like it is not the case. Have you figured out how to calculate it?
Thanks
RE: Unbraced length Lu
Good Luck,
RE: Unbraced length Lu
RE: Unbraced length Lu
Can you plese define the variables and the units in this equation?
Thanks
RE: Unbraced length Lu
12, in/ft;
d, in;
Af in^2
RE: Unbraced length Lu
This is only part of your concern. You also have to check lateral torsional buckling, web local buckling, and flange local buckling, to find out if any of these control L.
RE: Unbraced length Lu
ive got my new S16-01, most of torsional-flexural requirements for compression members are applicable only to asymetric, singly symmetric and cruciform sections which are rarely used compared with standard rolled sections.
kbarnett,
that formula you wrote is from AISC360-05 and the results obtained from that are nowhere near the values in CISC tables. and indeed, i have all those cases covered in the separate program i developed for AISC steel design from case F2 to F7.
malkobani,
using an iteration procedure and applying a lateral-torsional buckling coefficient of 2.5 (maximum value permitted in AISC ASD 9th ed.) to Galambos ultimate moment "Mu" for lateral torsional buckling would yeild a fairly similar value.
since all the methods i tried have 5-10% difference from CISC Lu values, i went on with the hard way - i.e., prepare a database for all Lu values for sections identified in CISC handbook. For sections that are not given Lu values, i treat them as laterally unbraced members and i got good results for Mr.
thanks for all the replies.