From the story:
"Unless I'm missing something, I don't see why (the ceiling designer) requires a 4 bolt anchor plate when a 2 bolt anchor plate would be sufficient," Robert Richard of Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff wrote.
Richard's memo, dated June 23, 1998 and addressed to Gary Baxter, also of Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff, said Gannett Fleming should either cut the number of bolts in half or submit calculations "proving that 2 anchor bolts do not work," the newspaper reported.
Gannett Fleming officials agreed to reduce the number of bolts, calculating that the ceiling would be safe "assuming proper installation and quality of the product materials," according to a company statement."
OK, so it looks like calculations were submitted proving that two bolts would work. What's the problem?
Bechtel/PB and Gannett-Fleming aren't rookies and don't hire people who are intimidated by much of anything (it's the other way around, in my experience). If there's money to be made, they make it and if a real savings - without compromising safety - could be realized, then they are 100% within their right to make it happen.
Let's see the calcs and not let the Boston Globe tell us our business.
Be that as it may, if this turns out to really be something akin to the Hyatt-Regency, then their heads should roll.