Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

2000 IBC 1708.2

2000 IBC 1708.2

2000 IBC 1708.2

Are the provisions of the above section meant to apply to roof top units?  If the units have internal vibration isolators, then I say it doesn't apply. This is currently being debated here.

RE: 2000 IBC 1708.2

To me it looks like roof top units are what 1708.2.3 is talking about - referring to 1708.5, where there exists requirements that the units be evaluated for seismic competency....both internally (the unit doesn't shake apart or fail like a little building) and externally (its attachments are adequate to keep the unit from separating from the supporting structure.

Internal vibration isolators for these units are usually providing for vertical vibrations?  correct?  If so, what about the lateral forces?  I'm not sure that vibration isolators always do the same thing that seismic isolators do.

RE: 2000 IBC 1708.2

A thousand pardons JAE, I mistakenly typed 1708.2, when I meant 1607.8.2.  We are debating if 1607.8.2 is intended to apply to RTU's.  It seems to me that an RTU with internal vibration isolators won't be transferring vibrations from its normal operation, and thus an impact allowance is not necessary.  There is an internal debate going on here.

I agree with what your are saying about 1708.  Again, my apologies for the bad first post, my brain apparently short-circuited when typing.

RE: 2000 IBC 1708.2

I guess I can't formulate an opinion on that section other than to say that high frequency vibrations don't usually effect structures via "impact"...only when motor-driven machinery starts up initially does there occur a torque force that would be applied to the supporting framework.  However, with isolators, it seems that they would avoid that effect.

RE: 2000 IBC 1708.2

Thanks JAE, that's what I thought.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close