Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Zero planes

Status
Not open for further replies.

aniiben

Mechanical
Joined
May 9, 2017
Messages
165
Location
US
4.10.3/2009 states:

Depending on the number of planes established by higher precedence datums, secondary and tertiary datum axes may
establish zero, one, or two theoretical planes.



My question is: which figure shows Zero theoretical datum planes (if an example of such is shown)

If not, can someone describe/ show an example for proper understanding.
 
aniiben,

Seems to me the key is that it refers to secondary/tertiary datums. There are plenty of cases where a secondary/tertiary datum only serves to orient the datum planes established by higher precedence datums. See Fig 4-6/2009 - tertiary datum C does not establish any planes but orients the 2x planes established by datum B. If B were primary and C secondary, the same would still be true.
 
I am taking about datum axes. Tertiary C is not an axis.
 
Apologies - I missed that the secondary/tertiary datums you referred to were axes. Refer then to fig 4-9/2009, my statements still stand for datums B and C of that figure.
 
chez311

Any example in the standard where secondary datum axis establishes one or zero planes?
 
Should I understand that in fig 4.9, B will establish two theoretical planes and C will establish zero?
If yes, then any examples establishing one?
 
AM Engineer,
After a quick page through the standard I did not see any. Just imagine as I said Fig 4-9 replacing reference A|B|C in one of the FCFs to B|C instead. The secondary datum C will establish zero in that case.

aniiben,
aniiben 28 Mar 19 16:27 said:
Should I understand that in fig 4.9, B will establish two theoretical planes and C will establish zero
Yes.

I do not see any establishing one either - not surprising as that is probably rather rarely encountered. I think you could accomplish this in Fig. 4-5/4-6 with the references to B and C reversed - ie: place A|C|B in the FCF. In that case C will establish one and B will establish the remaining one perpendicular to it, passing through the axis of datum feature B.
 
Look at Fig. 4-16, using option (c). Datum D doesn't really establish a datum plane because it simply acts to orient the existing planes created by datum B (the higher-prededence datum). Perhaps that's what they mean by saying that the tertiary datum creates zero planes.

John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems
 
JP,

Even though 4-16(c) violates datum precedence, is it that different from 4-9 solely in regards to the number of datum planes created by the tertiary datum axis?
 
No different -- my example duplicates your comment.

John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top