laviniu
Computer
- Jan 6, 2006
- 3
Hi,
I'm a total amateur in both finite element modeling and structural analysis so please bear with me. I'm trying to model a sandwich table structure composed of 8020 Inc aluminum extrusions between two medium density fiberboard(MDF) sheets, 0.75" thick.
I'm building a CNC router for hobby purposes and I need to calculate the deflection of the table once I put a heavy loading representing the machining stock on it. Ideally I need to be under 0.01" for the heaviest load I need to machine. I've already modeled the structure by using beams and thick shells that share common nodes and I have a non acceptable deflection, like 0.0189" so I thought about adding another layer of MDF underneath the aluminum beams which are 3" thick. This souds logical because of the increased moment of inertia the thickeness of the beams gives to the MDF sheeets.
I have an issue with adding the second layer of thick shell elements. I don't know exactly how to model those. Considering everything symmetrical, the nodes from the the bottom MDF sheet should somehow be "in sync" with the correspondig nodes of the upper sheet in the sandwich. I'm using EMRC NISA software because it's cheap and I don't know exactly what construction should I use. I don't like (or I don't completely understand) the rigid links or coupled displacements. What I miss is some sort of contact elements. But no such thing with NISA.
What I was thinking about is actually creating small beam elements that have very small cross section area and superstiff low density hypotetical material to "link" the nodes from the upper and lower sheets and to account for the thickness of the beam. Would that be a reasonable aprroximation or something stupid? You see I have a couple of limitations here: non-standard cross section beam and no contact elements. How would you guys model this in Nastran?
I'm throwing this question but I don't know if someone will answer it. So be it. I have the gut feeling the sandwich will take care of the deflection but I don't know how to prove it, plus the roughing doesn't need to be that accurate and it will remove a very big part of the stock so the loading decreases significantly and the finishing pass will be more accurate.
Thanks,
Laviniu
I'm a total amateur in both finite element modeling and structural analysis so please bear with me. I'm trying to model a sandwich table structure composed of 8020 Inc aluminum extrusions between two medium density fiberboard(MDF) sheets, 0.75" thick.
I'm building a CNC router for hobby purposes and I need to calculate the deflection of the table once I put a heavy loading representing the machining stock on it. Ideally I need to be under 0.01" for the heaviest load I need to machine. I've already modeled the structure by using beams and thick shells that share common nodes and I have a non acceptable deflection, like 0.0189" so I thought about adding another layer of MDF underneath the aluminum beams which are 3" thick. This souds logical because of the increased moment of inertia the thickeness of the beams gives to the MDF sheeets.
I have an issue with adding the second layer of thick shell elements. I don't know exactly how to model those. Considering everything symmetrical, the nodes from the the bottom MDF sheet should somehow be "in sync" with the correspondig nodes of the upper sheet in the sandwich. I'm using EMRC NISA software because it's cheap and I don't know exactly what construction should I use. I don't like (or I don't completely understand) the rigid links or coupled displacements. What I miss is some sort of contact elements. But no such thing with NISA.
What I was thinking about is actually creating small beam elements that have very small cross section area and superstiff low density hypotetical material to "link" the nodes from the upper and lower sheets and to account for the thickness of the beam. Would that be a reasonable aprroximation or something stupid? You see I have a couple of limitations here: non-standard cross section beam and no contact elements. How would you guys model this in Nastran?
I'm throwing this question but I don't know if someone will answer it. So be it. I have the gut feeling the sandwich will take care of the deflection but I don't know how to prove it, plus the roughing doesn't need to be that accurate and it will remove a very big part of the stock so the loading decreases significantly and the finishing pass will be more accurate.
Thanks,
Laviniu