I got a quiet laugh out of FieldTeam's mention of SAE-AS 50881C. One time I worked for an outfit that went all the way to paragraph 'd'... or maybe it should be 'z'.
We were only making four (complex) systems, with units coming from two locations. What could possibly go wrong?
In order to save money, we only used white wire. With heat-shrink sleeves, nicely stamped with each wire's designation. Okay, not so bad.
Also in order to save money, 'we' ordered the five big, many-hole, system harness connectors with identical keys. Color coded sleeves, right? Nope. Hot-stamped reference designators, black on white, easy enough to read.
This is where we went off the track. Remember, the major units came from different companies at different locations. Clearly documented, somewhere, was the fact that the connector on the harness from Unit 1, marked P1, was supposed to be plugged into the socket on Unit 2 marked J3, and conversely, or something like that, because of some design change or early screwup that would have been expensive to fix otherwise. All the EEs knew about it, and their managers had signed off.
At System Integration time, however, they were short of bodies, and enlisted one of my ME friends, who logically put P1 in J1 and conversely. ... which connected a really stiff +5 supply to ground, in a loop that ran through >every< harness.
Yep, saved a bunch of money there...
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA