The responsibility for the collection of data to be interpreted by an engineer is the responsibilty of the engineer that will be interpreting the data. If an engineer formulates his/her engineering recommendations on a data set that they have no ownership over, then if/when problems develop, they can hide in their hole and just whine that they were just doing what they were told to do.
If/when I get a request from an engineer to perform a geotechnical engineering study and the request includes a boring location plan, I ignore the boring location plan and make my own. I then call the engineer making the request and we discuss the two different programs. Sometimes, one of the borings is for a concern that is justified and I'll add it to my program, other times it just makes no sense. I will not formulate my geotechnical engineering recommendations on a program designed by others, unless they happen to get it right (at least from my perspective).
Next question: What defines an "engineer of record"? The reason that I ask is there is no doubt a civil engineer of record and a structural engineer of record and they may pinpoint a different set of borings, based on their experience and what they believe to be important. It's the responsibility of the geotechnical engineer to interpret the needs of both these engineering disiplines and provide a report that speaks to earthwork, foundations, pavements slabs on grade, etc.
f-d
¡papá gordo ain’t no madre flaca!