Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

What takes up more space in Solidworks? A cube or a box? 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

titaniumapple

Industrial
Jan 17, 2007
46
Hi, just wondering what would require more computing power to move around/model in Solidworks - a solid cube or a hollowed out one?

It's just so I know whether I need to shell something or not to get the best performance.

Thanks!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

A solid cube would require less than a shelled cube, because it has fewer surfaces and vertices to compute.

[cheers]
 
Thanks!

So that means it's not about the amount of material then
 
No, it depends on the number of features, surfaces, radii, ect in a model. What are you trying to accomplish? Perhaps with more details we can offer better tips.

"Art without engineering is dreaming; Engineering without art is calculating."

Have you read faq731-376 to make the best use of Eng-Tips Forums?
 
Ah okay I understand. It's not really for anything right now, I was just wondering for future reference so I know how to cut down on stuff I don't need to make the system run smoother.

Less features = better performance
 
Hello titaniumapple,

Just to add one more thing...

Try Tools > Feature Statistics

And you will see which features take the longest to rebuild. You can then choose which features you can suppress in order to improve performance.

cheers,
 
Check out Simplify part and simplify, complex models in the SW Help section.

[cheers]
 
Yeah, some features are "heavier" than others, even ones that create the same thing as something else. For instance, I believe the new boundary surface feature is faster than the fill feature for doing the same thing. Fillets around complex geomrety can load the system so I would avoid adding them if they are only there for cosmetic reasons. Or put fillet features in a folder together at the end of tree and keep them suppressed until needed. Same goes for large patterns.

Jason

UG NX2.02.2 on Win2000 SP3
UG NX4.01.0 on Win2000 SP3
SolidWorks 2007 SP3.1 on WinXP SP2

 
C.B.L...

Is that SIMPLIFY utility a part od SolidWorks... or CosmosWorks?
...because I can't find it.
I can read about it in the HELP menu... but still can't find it.

Windows XP / Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse 5000
SolidWorks 2007 SP2.2 / SpaceBall 5000
Lava Lamp
"Right-click... It's friggin' magic!" ... Jack L. Tate

FAQ376
 
Its part of the Utilities add-in.

Jason

UG NX2.02.2 on Win2000 SP3
UG NX4.01.0 on Win2000 SP3
SolidWorks 2007 SP3.1 on WinXP SP2

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor