We are running Solidworks 2003, and

[DHALE1]

We are running Solidworks 2003, and currently do not have a pdm system. My question is, is there a way in Solidworks to do a parts where used? This is the same function that is in Solidworks explorer. Currently we use find references to find all files that are used to build the top level. It would be nice if we had something similar to find all top level files that a part is used in. Does anyone know of a way in SolidWorks, or have a marco (api)?

Thanks

 

[macduff]

Could you create a custom propriety field to accomplish this task?

 

[CorBlimeyLimey]

Why not use SW Explorer?


CorBlimeyLimey
Barrie, Ontario
faq559-863

 

[DHALE1]

I don't have a problem using solidworks explorer, but trying to get everyone else to check is the problem. If you don't make it easy then they don't do it. Also, I don't tend to use explorer very often, so it would be convenient for me too.

 

[SBaugh]

You can open SW explorer up in SW - Tools\SW Explorer

That gets pretty easy. Other than making some API program I think you might be SOL. (No offense)

Regards,

Scott Baugh, CSWP

http://www.3dvisiontech.com

http://www.scottjbaugh.com

faq731-376

 

[JNR]

I'm not sure what your problem is. Are you asking for an AUTOMATIC WU every time you open an assembly file just because your users are too lazy to manually instigate a check?

I'd suggest you slap 'em up the side of the head with a 2x4 a few times. Ie. Tell them here are the procedures you will use and if you don't, you will not get a good review and raise next year - works every time. Heck you are paying them to do as the company wants, not what they fancy doing themselves.

I was - and he did. So at least I didn't get coal.....

 

[automationbabe]

Are you using an MRP system? Most of these have where used function that is ver effective. Have to get your parts made somehow...

 

[CorBlimeyLimey]

I agree with JNR although "slap 'em up the side of the head with a 2x4 a few times" is a bit excessive......usually once is enough.



CorBlimeyLimey
Barrie, Ontario
faq559-863

 

[SBaugh]

Depends on how big they are, and how much beer they have had.

,

Scott Baugh, CSWP

http://www.3dvisiontech.com

http://www.scottjbaugh.com

faq731-376

 

[CorBlimeyLimey]

This is true.


CorBlimeyLimey
Barrie, Ontario
faq559-863

 

[JNR]

Well, if it's a good micro-brew (or real ale for you Brits) then....... oh! wait a minute, they wouldn't be that dumb then would they? Ween 'em of that domestic pee water and maybe they'll grow less obnoxious.

Joking apart. I really do think that it seems to be a laziness and lack of procedures problem. Are you guys going for ISO9000 or AS9100? If so, as whisper in the auditor's ear would cause the problem to get fixed real quick.



I was - and he did. So at least I didn't get coal.....

 

[DHALE1]

There is more to it than just laziness. With cut backs and down sizing we are asked to do alot more. We have an mrp system, and are in the process of converting to SAP. But, in the meantime when we look in our mrp system for where used, it does not tell us what kind of document it is. We have cadkey documents, medusa documents, manual documents, and solidworks documents. With our work load, we try to catch everything, but sometimes things get by. We deal with alot of engineering change orders, and appreciate anything that can make things a little easier. I didn't think I was asking for that much. Solidworks has find references, why couldn't they put the where used in too. With the parametrics I would think it is important to check all assemblies where the part you are changeing is found.
As far as processes go, we have been using Solidworks for under a year. I think we have come along way in a short time, and recognize that we still have a long way to go.

Give me a break, we are still learning.

 

[CorBlimeyLimey]

DHALE1
Lighten up!!! Don't take the jokes so personal, many of us are in the same boat when it comes to cutbacks, downsizing & workloads. A little levity can go a long way!

"but trying to get everyone else to check is the problem. If you don't make it easy then they don't do it.
The point that was being made was that feature you are looking for already exists in SW Explorer & is very simple & easy to use. If it is adopted as company policy & practice it should be used & adhered to as should any other company procedure or standard. Try working in an automotive, aeronautic or government environment & see what happens if procedures are not followed. It's their way or the Highway.

Have fun while you learn!



CorBlimeyLimey
Barrie, Ontario
faq559-863

 

[JNR]

Continuing on the theme...... If SW were to implement a WU, you have to think about how it works. it is a CAD system, not an integrated PDM system. S owhe nyou load a part or assembly, that's all SW looks for and loads. So i think that logically all they could do is essentially launch SW Explorer from inside SW (which is pretty much whatyou have now). Obviously money is an issue, so you are looking for a workable compromise. Could you write a Macro or something to lauch SW Expl and make it look like a custom command to the "lazy" people? (Maybe even just some kind of pop-up reminder when they open a part.)

Also, in all fairness, I would think that even allowing for the workload this is important enough to enforce some procedures. You would think that in your (albeit unfortunate) circumstances people would consider making the effort and following the rules or they might be next to be next in line to be downsized. It almost seems like they have given up - though I know that layoff's, poor sales and downsizing, etc. do hurt morale and motivation. You might try to find some inexpensive thing to improve morale. You would be surprised what small, simple things do work. In fact sometimes its the simple little gestures that seem to work best. When times are tough even the silliest little things can either hurt or help beyond all logical explanation.

I was - and he did. So at least I didn't get coal.....
OK, OK, It's a reference to my holiday sig. "Be naughty - Save Santa a trip..."