Abuh001
Civil/Environmental
- Jan 24, 2018
- 29
Hi I hope you are doing well.
Recently as a structural engineer I have been looking to improve my Geotechnical skills. I have opened up the old textbooks and looked over foundation design using the Brinch Hansen approach. One of terms in the equation is for effective overburdened pressure = unit weight of soil x height - pore water pressure
However for silts and clays the capillary fringe can extend 3m above the water table. The hand book of geo investigation and design tables by Burt Look suggests using saturated density for all soils in the capillary fringe zone. Does that mean I need to also assume pore water pressure in increases.
An example to illustrate
So dry density of silt, let's say 17Kn/m3
Saturated density = 19kn/3
If the water table is 5m below ground and I am looking at the overburden 2.5m below ground. Would I do to following.
Assume calipary fringe extends to 2m bgl
Pressure= (17x2.0+19x0.5) - (9.81x0.5).
Or am I overthinking this and you would just do
17x2.5.
Recently as a structural engineer I have been looking to improve my Geotechnical skills. I have opened up the old textbooks and looked over foundation design using the Brinch Hansen approach. One of terms in the equation is for effective overburdened pressure = unit weight of soil x height - pore water pressure
However for silts and clays the capillary fringe can extend 3m above the water table. The hand book of geo investigation and design tables by Burt Look suggests using saturated density for all soils in the capillary fringe zone. Does that mean I need to also assume pore water pressure in increases.
An example to illustrate
So dry density of silt, let's say 17Kn/m3
Saturated density = 19kn/3
If the water table is 5m below ground and I am looking at the overburden 2.5m below ground. Would I do to following.
Assume calipary fringe extends to 2m bgl
Pressure= (17x2.0+19x0.5) - (9.81x0.5).
Or am I overthinking this and you would just do
17x2.5.