As a manufacturer of the equipment that performs the VSR Process, and developer and frequent practicioner of the process, I would like to offer the conclusions of our experience:
First, we do see a change in the resonance patterns (growth of resonance peaks being the stronger, shift to lower frequency being the weaker) of cold-worked pipe products. But we have had a mixed level or success in solving problems that the material suffers, such as dimensional instability. In almost all situations, there is improvement, but at times it is marginal.
Second, the vast majority of applications of the VSR Process remain large welded structures, castings and hot-rolled or formed products. Within these categories (and it would appear virtually independent of chemistry), the VSR Process can repeatedly and predictably render a wide range of components dimensionally stable and very well behaved during machining, assembly, field use. Often such parts are more stable than what can be accomplished with thermal, which is why so many machine tool builders use the VSR Process. A typical example: An 18 meter longer gantry for a milling machine, VSR Processed before and after rough machining, has a TIR envelope of straightness of about 1/10 of a mmm (0.004") full length. The gantry displayed the same accuracy (as did also a twin to it) on-site, after installation, hundreds of miles from the machine tool manufacturer.
So, I would approach such applications experimentally. Make sure the gear used has very good vibrator speed regulation, variable unbalance, is capable of speeds that can resonante the components involved, and instrumentation that is capable of tracking BOTH the types of changes outlined above. Since pipe has to be fixtured, proper design of the fixture, so as to allow resonanting, but efficient transfer of vibration signal (somewhat cross-purpose design goals) is also important.
Hope this helps.