Hi all
Thanks for all these replies!
I've had a play about with what I can easily calculate without getting into too much complex heat transfer theory - it is a while since I had to do that kinda maths - and then come back here to see Stonecold's suggestion which is near as dammit what I came up with (I even had "assume it is a baloon" on my spreadsheet!) Didn't use differential eqn, relied on old favourite "Goal Seek" and a very small initial time increment.
I had a play with both "steam" (given it is an atmospheric tank, assumed that it was full of steam at 1 atm) and air. Given the high latent heat to condense the steam, the effect on volume from the given inlet flowrate of water was more pronounced with temperature change of air - but I'm gonna revisit now having thought about the fact that I could have a density change in the steam rather than condensing it.
for the "full of hot air" case: I'd included for incoming air at ~0 degC (outside air in winter) having additional cooling effect, and found a required flowrate; then checked choked velocity of this air and from these two determined a minimum area, stuck in a +50% fudge factor given my knowledge of compressible flow and how relevant that max rate actually is - given comments in the other linked thread above - and came up with needing a vent just over 6 inches diameter. If I drop CIP temperature to 50 degC then I get about 5 inches.
This is interesting - and kinda holds true, as the part I had not told you is
- our tanks original CIP cycle was 50 degrees with 6" vent on the tank
- at some point in the dim and distant past, before my time and my introduction of a change control system for process alterations, this was upped to 80 degC to give a better clean
- we've this week inspected a tank because it was making a "loud banging noise" during CIP / rinse and found some nice creases and bends in it (not externally visible due to lagging) suggesting it has been on a bit of a "wobble"
... so by my (and Stonecold) method, worst? case with a fudge factor, the existing 6" vents were OK for a lower temperature difference but not great for the higher temperature difference from the hotter clean.
I'll tidy up my spreadsheet and stick it up here for you all to rip holes in.......
Ref cost - remember in my case, these tanks are open to atmosphere via the vent,I don't have a valve to install, incremental cost for installing new 6" vs 12" vent is hardly worth worrying about - impact of size and design is cleanability and hygiene.
Morton - ref API 2000 - no use as specifically excludes this type of situation.
Latexman - there's a dozen different spray nozzles involved.. The tank farm has been expanded over time (again before my time) by "copy what we had but make it bigger - what sprayball did that have? - dunno just stck one in" - thankfully impact of implosion or damage is financial and a bit of mess on the floor to our contained drains, vs some form of hazardous / polluting substance showering people and environment. The remaining tanks on site still have the lower temperature clean.
Thanks again all. As a process engineering department of one on my site, it is good to be able to bounce things round a bit.