I think I have detected two different tricks:
- shim the anchor point for the spring(s) away from the clutch plates so there's less preload applied to the clutch pack as you tighten up the retaining bolts.
- interpose something so that the diaphragm spring, where one is used, is anchored at a different radius from stock.
Both result in less total force applied to the clutch pack at idle, making it easier to pull the lever to disengage the clutch.
Both result in it being necessary to use an adjustment procedure different from that for the stock hardware, so don't lose the instructions.
Both result in it being more likely for the fully engaged clutch to slip at low rpm with a lot of throttle. That's exactly what dragster 'slipper clutches' do.
The other side of that coin is that it's less likely for the fully engaged clutch to slip at high rpm than it otherwise would be, thanks to the extra force exerted by the centrifugal weights.
The sharp edge of the coin is that the centrifugal weights that apply extra force at high rpm also make it harder to disengage the clutch at high rpm. If adjustment is provided, e.g. variable number of weights, you might not want to overdo it, unless you've modified the engine for extra power.
I'm assuming you can manage a quick hard pull on the clutch for a gearchange, or maybe just use the kill switch, but are having a hard time slipping the clutch in traffic. The VPC should help with that.
I could not find any sort of power booster to be inserted in the cable itself. It's probably more of a packaging problem than an engineering problem. ... and the market is small, unless you can make it universal enough to fit newer bikes as well as yours.
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA