Suggestion to the previous posting marked ///\\\:
Just watch those conversions. Jbartos converted cycles per sec to radians per sec, and still does't have something that can be added directly to angular displacement expressed in degrees. Fancier calculators probably don't care if units are properly entered.
///I am in agreement with
Donald G. Fink, H. Wayne Beaty, "Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers," 14th Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2000, Section 2.1.16 "Electric Energy Distribution in 3-Phase Systems"
377=2 x pi x f is in radians/second
2 is in Per Unit
pi=3.14 in Per Unit
f=60Hz=60cycles/second
It is true that the 120° shall be shown as 2 x pi / 3; however, since the rotating frame is involved and degree displacements are shown properly, it does not matter much about the rest, if the mathematics is somewhat abused. Other books are using this too as the above-mentioned reference. E.g. see
Vincent Del Toro, " Electric Power Systems," Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 07632, 1992, page 28, eq. 1-23, eq. 1-24 and eq. 1-25
So they are really inaccurate. Apparently, one has to adjust degrees to radians or vice versa to obtain correct results. I am glad that you pointed it out, and that these small discrepancies from books are revealed thanks to this Forum. I have been running into many of these so that I know what I have to do to obtain correct results. Apparently, it then belongs to the profession not to complain much.\\