JAE
Structural
- Jun 27, 2000
- 15,591
I know that Cd is used to factor up the "elastic" lateral story drifts to provide a more realistic lateral drift under a seismic event. The IBC indicates the use of Cd with [δ]xe in section 12.8.6 of the ASCE 7.
However, there is also a vertical component to seismic effects required using 0.2SDS to be added to the dead loads of a member.
The question is raised as to whether the Cd factor can be or should be applied to this vertical seismic load to get a more accurate measure of vertical deflection under dead and seismic loads.
I can't think of a significant reason to be concerned with vertical DL deflection plus vertical magnified seismic deflection except under some cases where a vertical sag might be a concern for clearances etc.
Also, ASCE 7 only speaks of Cd in the context of story drifts, not vertical beam deflections.
So the question is - do we ever include the Cd factor on the 0.2SDS?
However, there is also a vertical component to seismic effects required using 0.2SDS to be added to the dead loads of a member.
The question is raised as to whether the Cd factor can be or should be applied to this vertical seismic load to get a more accurate measure of vertical deflection under dead and seismic loads.
I can't think of a significant reason to be concerned with vertical DL deflection plus vertical magnified seismic deflection except under some cases where a vertical sag might be a concern for clearances etc.
Also, ASCE 7 only speaks of Cd in the context of story drifts, not vertical beam deflections.
So the question is - do we ever include the Cd factor on the 0.2SDS?