Interesting. I hope you try it and let us know.
The last time I did a 'wet' configuration [calibration] (10 years ago), by applying a pressure then specifying what the applied pressure value was, the transmitter set the URV (20mA) to that applied pressure value. I had no choice in the matter. Doing so changed the URV to the applied pressure value. I can't recall whose brand it was.
Here is Rosemount's statement for lower/upper trim:
Rosemount 3051S Series manual (page 80):
To calibrate the sensor with a Field Communicator using the sensor trim function, perform the following procedure:
1. Assemble and power the entire calibration system including a transmitter, Field Communicator, power supply, pressure input source, and readout device.
2. From the HOME screen, enter the fast key sequence under “Sensor Trim.”
3. Select 2: Lower sensor trim. The lower sensor trim value should be the sensor trim point that is closest to zero.
4. Follow the commands provided by the Field Communicator to complete the adjustment of the lower value.
5. Repeat the procedure for the upper value, replacing 2: Lower sensor trim with 3: Upper sensor trim in Step 3.
NOTE:
Select pressure input values so that lower and upper values are equal to or outside the 4 and 20 mA points. Do not attempt to obtain reverse output by reversing the high and low points. This can be done by going to “Rerange” on
page 3-9 of Section 3: Configuration. The transmitter allows approximately five percent deviation.
NOTE
The transmitter must be within three percent of true zero (zero-based) in order to calibrate with zero trim function.
----------------
It isn't clear whether the applied pressures and values are a zero and span values between which read pressures are linearized or whether the URV is affected in any way. Since URV isn't mentioned, it might not. But then again, you might not have a Rosemount 3051.
In any event, can you isolate and bleed it to check zero?
What have you got to lose by trying a span trim?