Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

UBC load combinations

Status
Not open for further replies.

dwduqu

Structural
Joined
Nov 2, 2002
Messages
10
Location
US
I'm using Enercal for a cantilevered retaining wall system and they have a 1.7H factor (it will multiply the force by 1.7) embeded in the design program - for where they suggest earthquake forces from the soil are entered for the design of the stem of the wall.

My question is either to use that 1.7H for the earthquake forces of the soil to the retaining wall stem or 1.1E which could be interperted as = 1.1(1.6H)= 1.76 as outlined in the 97 UBC.

Also, do any of you use the smilutaneous effects of the later pressures caused by the soil and active pressures as outlined in NAVFAC? Thanks!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top