Curious on how other firms have construct their typical detail libraries...
In the details themselves, do you have "user notes" that tell people the items that need to be reviewed/checked (such as weld sizes, etc) and notes to the applicability of the detail or things to consider when using?
I can see pluses and minuses of doing this sort of things. I was always taught that the detail are "a starting point" just so that things dont get re-drafted or started from scratch, however i have seen that the younger generation seems to just slap these details on the drawings without even looking at them or giving them much thought.
Curious as to how other firms handle this and if its worth going through the effort of creating notes as described. My concern is that if this was done, those items would be the only things checked, but unless the list is comprehensive (which would take so long to create), those would be the only items that are checked. Which i guess is better than nothing, but it still doesn't solve the issue....
What are you all doing?
In the details themselves, do you have "user notes" that tell people the items that need to be reviewed/checked (such as weld sizes, etc) and notes to the applicability of the detail or things to consider when using?
I can see pluses and minuses of doing this sort of things. I was always taught that the detail are "a starting point" just so that things dont get re-drafted or started from scratch, however i have seen that the younger generation seems to just slap these details on the drawings without even looking at them or giving them much thought.
Curious as to how other firms handle this and if its worth going through the effort of creating notes as described. My concern is that if this was done, those items would be the only things checked, but unless the list is comprehensive (which would take so long to create), those would be the only items that are checked. Which i guess is better than nothing, but it still doesn't solve the issue....
What are you all doing?