Thanks Evelrod, I have held the Chief Engineers position for the last 15 months and am trying to develop some best practices to take off from where the past Chief Engineers' preventative maintenace procedures left off. My past discipline was as an Industrial maintenance foreman specializing in mechanical drives and have seen many cases of cost savings from the results of scheduled inspection, specific testing and trending of results to prevent basing replacement intervals on gut feelings or component performance from 10 or 15 years ago. Like you say the current charging systems and storage cells are far superior to those of one or two decades past. What I am trying to find is some supporting opinions to put at ease those on the department who can not comprehend the aspects of testing and trending to determine replacement needs.
I have instituted fluid testing and trending for the engines, tranfer cases, driveline transmissions and pump transmissions, so I am not up against a brick wall, but I have more experience in this area and was better prepared to provide supporting data and case histories.
Our fleet consists of newer Macks and Peterbilts one older ('68)Ford 750 GPM pumper and a Dodge utility van as our oldest pieces of equipment, so fortunatly our front line units use the latest in mobile electrical systems. Hence my hopes of saving tax dollars by not replacing the batteries until they display some sign of deteriorating performance through
testing and trending.