bookowski
Structural
- Aug 29, 2010
- 983
I'm sure this is a typical detail but I haven't dealt with it and could use a point in the right direction.
I have an industrial building with an existing 6in. slab on grade. They want to put in a trench for electric, about 75 linear feet. The trench is supposed to be 6" deep x 6" wide, and have a flush removable cover. I took a look online and saw some precast systems but they seemed like overkill.
I've never done this but I was thinking of the attached sketch. Basically overcut the existing slab and provide a concrete beam, with a formed trench in the top and expansion/movement joint at each side. This will have forklifts traveling over it so it will see some decent point loads.
Is this overkill? Is there a typical detail for this that makes more sense? Do the joints at the side make sense or would it be better to provide only a normal control joint in the top 1/4 of the joint. Thanks.
I have an industrial building with an existing 6in. slab on grade. They want to put in a trench for electric, about 75 linear feet. The trench is supposed to be 6" deep x 6" wide, and have a flush removable cover. I took a look online and saw some precast systems but they seemed like overkill.
I've never done this but I was thinking of the attached sketch. Basically overcut the existing slab and provide a concrete beam, with a formed trench in the top and expansion/movement joint at each side. This will have forklifts traveling over it so it will see some decent point loads.
Is this overkill? Is there a typical detail for this that makes more sense? Do the joints at the side make sense or would it be better to provide only a normal control joint in the top 1/4 of the joint. Thanks.