crshears
Electrical
- Mar 23, 2013
- 1,776
First post in railroad equipment engineering forum...
My interest in rr's has been revived since I started volunteering aboard the retired / legacy steam ship SS Keewatin [www.sskeewatin.com], formerly an asset of the Great Lakes Steamship Service of the Canadian Pacific Railway...
Question: for transportation by rail in North America, is liquid CO2 usually shipped cryogenically in insulated tankers so the pressure rating of the tank needn't be as high, or at ambient temperature and higher pressure so there will be less net loss en route due to expansion & blow-off?
For answers to the above, what reasoning is applied and/or what regulations prevail to dictate doing this one way or the other? Internet search results have proven less than stellar...
Thanks!
CR
"As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another." [Proverbs 27:17, NIV]
My interest in rr's has been revived since I started volunteering aboard the retired / legacy steam ship SS Keewatin [www.sskeewatin.com], formerly an asset of the Great Lakes Steamship Service of the Canadian Pacific Railway...
Question: for transportation by rail in North America, is liquid CO2 usually shipped cryogenically in insulated tankers so the pressure rating of the tank needn't be as high, or at ambient temperature and higher pressure so there will be less net loss en route due to expansion & blow-off?
For answers to the above, what reasoning is applied and/or what regulations prevail to dictate doing this one way or the other? Internet search results have proven less than stellar...
Thanks!
CR
"As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another." [Proverbs 27:17, NIV]