Alexander Koss
Automotive
- Apr 8, 2020
- 24
Dear Forum,
I am currently working on a very large heat transfer analysis, which deals with factors like radiation and self-heating elements. Due to its complexity, it sometimes takes a very long amount of time to produce a solution. Therefore, I would love to hear some opinions from you guys, since I am not very experienced
1. Direct vs. Iterative solution method - would it make a large difference?
2. Quasi-Newton seems to not work for some reason - any idea why that could be the case?
3. Should I extrapolate the steps linearly, or rather in a parabolic way?
4. Matrix Storage: should a certain way be specified, or should it go by the default value?
5. Any other suggestions on speeding up a transient heat transfer solution?
Thank you very much in advance!![[bigsmile] [bigsmile] [bigsmile]](/data/assets/smilies/bigsmile.gif)
I am currently working on a very large heat transfer analysis, which deals with factors like radiation and self-heating elements. Due to its complexity, it sometimes takes a very long amount of time to produce a solution. Therefore, I would love to hear some opinions from you guys, since I am not very experienced
1. Direct vs. Iterative solution method - would it make a large difference?
2. Quasi-Newton seems to not work for some reason - any idea why that could be the case?
3. Should I extrapolate the steps linearly, or rather in a parabolic way?
4. Matrix Storage: should a certain way be specified, or should it go by the default value?
5. Any other suggestions on speeding up a transient heat transfer solution?
Thank you very much in advance!
![[bigsmile] [bigsmile] [bigsmile]](/data/assets/smilies/bigsmile.gif)