Hello to all the SE and PE. Please let me introduce myself. I am a NYS Certified Municipal Code Enforcement Official. I have a Degree in Architectural Technology. I have worked in architectural firms doing design build and structural design upto 1991. Since then I am working in the local building department reviewing plans. Since NYS adopted the IBC in 2003, structural compliance has turned into a nightmare. I have read this site many times and the information all of you are discussing is invaluable. Today however, I would like to ask for advise. I deal strictly with commercial buildings and the BCNYS which is close to the IBC. Today, I came across a set of plans for a new 3 story wood framed structure. Story 2 and 3 are set back from story 1 wood bearing walls and are inturn supported on a steel beam and column frame. Story 3 is within the roof. Story 2 exterior wood stud walls and floors are carried by the steel beams and story 1 roof rafters are sheds which rest on all wall sides of story 2. The plans and calculations address shear walls ONLY on story 1. The designer has stated that shear on second story is "neglidgible" and is "contained" by the shed roof of story one. How this works is not detailed. Story 2 has no hold downs, collector design or sole plate shear attachment, so CLP is questionable. Shear wall deflections have not been shown. Roof and foor diaphragm design is not provided. The designer states on plans that story 1 front elevation was worst case and all shear walls designed as perforated. Checking calculations and shear wall elevation, shear wall segments are shown with hold downs on the sides of EACH one. I believe that these are segmented walls. Also, segment height to width ratios are 9.33 feet high with smallest width of 2.67 feet. Calculations submitted were by computer method from "ENERCALC". Chapter 22 compliance was not provided, so steel detailing for seismic is not shown. Compliance with 1605, 1603, 1609, 1615-1620 and 2301 were not provided. As an unofficial opinion from the group, does this presented theory seem in compliance with the Building Codes? True, you do not have the papers in front of you, but frankly as a Code Official and discussing compliance with the design professional and supplying many shear wall design guide lines I just cant accept this. Off the record comments please. Thanx all and kudos on a great forum.