and once again we can't get any where near engineering solutions.
dik, I get the passion you have for this, but AFAICR no one is saying "stop burning FFs", 'cause the impact is certainly enormous against the possibility of extinction. If the "cure" is going to kill off 90% of us, I don't think many would go for it. Maybe the disease will kill off 90% of us ?
Of a certainty weather/climate things (storms, rainfall patterns, temperature, etc) are going to change in the future ... maybe more than in the past and maybe not ... we'll have to wait and see.
We don't even know what to address (hence we can't formulate any reasonable responses).
Maybe the ice caps will melt ... maybe, maybe not ? Maybe they'll melt as the weather patterns around the poles change (and no longer trap the cold air in the poles).
Maybe CO2 is the root of our demise, maybe it's something else. My money is still on "civil unrest".
Remember too we are part of the natural world. Maybe this is our role to play ? Mess about with FFs, go extinct, and let cockroaches and twinkie bars rule the world.
I suspect that the politics will play out. We'll do some actions to mitigate some of the affects. These will probably change decade by decade as political parties in power change and want to do something different than their predecessor. At random times we'll do nothing ... the people sick and tired of taxes will vote in a "denier" party on a "reduce taxes" and "trim the fat" ticket.
Write all the essays you like, it is good for your soul. I suspect that trying to get people to see your "obvious" "facts" will on the most part be frustrating.
@TBE, solar cells don't generate waste heat, so maybe a good source ? Similarly geothermal. Hydro is pretty efficient. I agree nukes create a lot of waste heat, that yes could be recovered
"Hoffen wir mal, dass alles gut geht !"
General Paulus, Nov 1942, outside Stalingrad after the launch of Operation Uranus.